Thanks for the reply, it is an interesting view. While I understand that the for..of cycles remedy some of the problems I have with cycles, I still prefer the reduce.
I admit that for something so simple as a sum there is a little advantage, but this was chosen as an illustration for the problem exactly for the simplicity of the problem.
What I wholeheartedly agree with you on is that the all the operators (including the function call operator) in JavaScript should be functions as well.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Thanks for the reply, it is an interesting view. While I understand that the
for..ofcycles remedy some of the problems I have with cycles, I still prefer thereduce.I admit that for something so simple as a sum there is a little advantage, but this was chosen as an illustration for the problem exactly for the simplicity of the problem.
What I wholeheartedly agree with you on is that the all the operators (including the function call operator) in JavaScript should be functions as well.