A simple case study on what works, what doesn’t, and what designers learned from it.
The Liquid Glass UI trend has suddenly become the center of every design conversation. Apple introduced it with iOS 26, and the style spread fast. It looks soft, modern, and a little futuristic. But the real question is simple: Is it actually useful or just visually exciting?
Let’s break it down with a real example and the core facts.
What Liquid Glass UI Really Means
Liquid Glass UI creates a frosted-glass feeling using blur, transparency, and depth. It looks like smooth layers floating over the background. Apple mostly uses it in navigation bars, panels, and overlays to separate content without adding heavy shadows.
Many people compare it with glassmorphism, but they are not the same. Glassmorphism is broad and sometimes looks artificial. Liquid Glass is softer and feels more intentional because it focuses on how light bends and how edges fade naturally.
Why Designers Care About It
A Clean, Modern Look
This style makes apps feel premium. The blur creates calmness, and the transparency adds depth. Users see layers without feeling overwhelmed.
Better Focus
Because the top layer is soft and semi-transparent, users can understand visual hierarchy faster. Important content stands out naturally.
Brand Value
Apps in music, luxury, AI, and creative fields use Liquid Glass UI to build a unique identity. It makes the product look polished, even before users start interacting.
Case Study: The Spotify Redesign That Sparked a Debate
A designer named 00mxhdi shared a Spotify redesign using Liquid Glass UI. It went viral on Reddit because the visuals looked dreamy and cinematic. People loved the floating glass panels and the soft blur. One comment even said, “It looks cool, man. I like liquid glass.”
But the reactions were mixed.
Some users said the blur was too heavy and made it hard to read text. Others felt the style only works when there is strong background color or artwork. Without that, the glass starts to look like an outdated 2000s glossy effect.
Another big point was technical. Figma cannot create real light refraction. So the design looked flat compared to real glass. This made the UI feel more decorative than functional.
This case study showed one clear thing: Liquid Glass UI works beautifully only when the context supports it.
The Most Common Design Mistakes
Using Glass Everywhere
If everything looks like glass, nothing stands out. The UI becomes confusing.
Weak Readability
A bright or busy background can make text difficult to read through the blur.
No Motion
Liquid Glass feels natural when paired with smooth animations. Without motion, it loses the “glass” feeling.
Where Liquid Glass UI Works Best
Liquid Glass UI shines in places where it can enhance clarity instead of stealing attention.
Music or Streaming Apps
Album covers and colorful gradients make the glass effect look rich and balanced.
Layered Dashboards
Finance and analytics dashboards can use it in filter panels or sidebars. It separates actions from data.
OLED Screens
The deep contrast helps the glass effect look sharp and elegant.
Small Micro-Interactions
Sliding cards and soft overlays make the UI feel alive.
Design Monks’ Angle on the Trend
At Design Monks, we see Liquid Glass UI as more than a visual upgrade. It must support real user experience. We test how it affects clarity, reading speed, and navigation.
For luxury brands or creative apps, we often recommend it. But for apps where speed and clarity matter most, a different approach works better. The trend is beautiful, but it must fit the brand’s goal.
Final Thoughts
Liquid Glass UI brings a fresh and elegant feel to digital products. It adds depth without relying on heavy visual tricks. But like any trend, it works best when used with intention.
If it helps users focus, it’s a win.
If it only adds shine, it becomes noise.
Top comments (0)