Tesr

Why you need EMR Serverless vs EMR Cluster
Core architectural difference

EMR Serverless
EMR Cluster
Infra model
On-demand compute
Persistent EC2 cluster
Scaling
Auto
Manual/auto-scaling groups
Billing
Per job runtime
Per instance uptime
Ops overhead
Very low
High
Best fit
Batch ML feature pipelines
Continuous big data platform
Advantages of EMR Serverless (for your case)
1️⃣ No cluster management
You don’t need to:
size instances
manage autoscaling
patch clusters
terminate clusters
This matters for MLOps teams that just want feature engineering compute.
Impact: Less DevOps overhead.
2️⃣ Cost-efficient for batch jobs
You pay only when the job runs.
For a 200 GB Spark job:
runtime ~20–40 min
billed only for that duration
With a cluster:
you pay even while idle
startup time billed
For intermittent pipelines → Serverless is cheaper.
3️⃣ Fast integration with SageMaker
Native pattern now used by AWS:
Text
Copy code
SageMaker Pipeline
   ↓
EMR Serverless job
   ↓
S3 features
   ↓
Training job
No separate big-data platform needed.
4️⃣ Auto scaling
Serverless:
starts with few executors
scales to dozens automatically
scales down after job
Cluster:
you must size nodes upfront
risk over/under provisioning
5️⃣ Good for data sizes in your range
Your data: 200 GB
Serverless sweet spot:
50 GB → 10 TB batch processing
So you’re right in the ideal zone.
6️⃣ Faster experimentation
From Studio you can:
run Spark job
tweak code
rerun
No waiting for cluster provisioning.
Disadvantages of EMR Serverless
Be precise here — it’s not perfect.
1️⃣ Not ideal for long-running jobs
If you run Spark continuously for hours/days:
cluster becomes cheaper
serverless startup overhead adds up
2️⃣ Limited deep infra tuning
Clusters allow:
custom AMIs
Hadoop configs
daemon services
HDFS tuning
Serverless:
fewer low-level controls
For ML feature jobs → usually fine.
3️⃣ Cold start latency
Each job:
~20–60 sec startup
For pipelines this is negligible.
For real-time workloads → not ideal.
4️⃣ Not for streaming
If you plan:
Kafka streaming
Spark streaming
real-time ingestion
Then cluster is required.
Advantages of EMR Cluster
1️⃣ Persistent compute
Good when:
jobs run all day
many teams share cluster
streaming workloads
2️⃣ Full control
You can tune:
executor layout
instance types
storage
networking
Spark configs
Needed only for very large/complex pipelines.
3️⃣ Better for continuous workloads
If Spark runs 24/7: cluster is cheaper.
Disadvantages of EMR Cluster
1️⃣ Operational overhead
You must manage:
provisioning
scaling
termination
monitoring
patching
For an ML team → unnecessary burden.
2️⃣ Idle cost
Cluster running but idle = still billed.
For periodic training pipelines → wasteful.
3️⃣ Slower iteration
Cluster startup: 5–10 minutes
Serverless: ~30 seconds
Direct comparison for your requirement
Your context:
Using SageMaker
Running processing jobs
Data ~200 GB
Likely batch feature engineering
Factor
Best choice
Cost for batch jobs
Serverless
Ease of use
Serverless
Integration with SageMaker
Serverless
Cluster ops team available?
No → Serverless
Streaming needed?
No → Serverless
Data size (200 GB)
Serverless
Long 24/7 workloads?
No → Serverless
Decision rule you can present to team
Use EMR Serverless if:
ML feature pipelines
Batch ETL
Data < ~20 TB typical
Jobs triggered from SageMaker
No streaming
No shared big data platform
Use EMR Cluster if:
Streaming pipelines
24/7 Spark
Shared data platform
Very heavy tuning required
Many concurrent teams