DEV Community

Doug Greenberg
Doug Greenberg

Posted on

5 Things $10M+ Business Owners Get Wrong About Private Equity in 401(k)s

I've been helping business owners navigate complex financial decisions for over three decades. Lately, I'm seeing a dangerous trend: successful entrepreneurs making*expensive mistakeswith private equity in their company 401(k) plans.
The numbers tell the story.
45% of 401(k) participants would invest in private equity if offered in their plans, according to Schroders' 2025 U. S. Retirement Survey. But most business owners are setting up these options completely wrong.
Here are the five biggest mistakes I see $10M+ business owners making with
private equity in 401(k)s*, and what to do instead.

Mistake #1: Assuming Private Equity Always Beats Public Markets

This is the big one. Business owners see private equity's*glossy marketing materialsand assume it's a guaranteed win for their employees' retirement plans.
Reality check:
Private equity showed no statistically significant return boost for state and local pension plans from 2001-2022*, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. Even the pre-crisis gains didn't hold up over the long term.
Here's what's really happening:

  • Survivorship biasskews the numbers you see in marketing
  • Fee structures eat into returns more than most realize
  • Liquidity constraints create hidden costs What to do instead:Treat private equity as one piece of a diversified strategy, not the centerpiece. Focus on the total cost of ownership, including fees, illiquidity premiums, and opportunity costs.

Mistake #2: Ignoring the Liquidity Problem

Private equity sounds great until your employee needs their money. I've seen business owners get blindsided by this reality.
The numbers are stark:Private equity funds took a median 2.5 years just to invest 60% of commitments, according to a Johns Hopkins Carey Business School study. Even worse?Only 20 of 59 funds (34%) sold over 90% of value after 12+ years.
Think about what this means for your employees:

  • Money tied up for*years longer than expected*
  • Limited access during financial emergencies
  • Complex redemption processes that frustrate participants The fix:If you're adding private equity options, make sure your plan includes robust liquidity alternatives. Never make PE the primary option for employees who might need emergency access to funds.

Mistake #3: Underestimating Employee Education Needs

Here's a sobering stat:Only 12% of 401(k) participants consider themselves very knowledgeable about private assets, and 53% view them as risky, per Schroders' survey.
Yet most business owners just add private equity options and assume employees will figure it out. That's a recipe for disaster.
I see three problems here:

  • Information overloadparalyzes decision-making
  • Employees make choices based on fear rather than facts
  • Poor communication leads to underutilization of good options The solution:Invest heavily in employee education. Create simple, clear materials that explain not just what private equity is, but when it makes sense and when it doesn't. Consider bringing in independent experts (not fund salespeople) to explain the options.

Mistake #4: Getting the Allocation Wrong

Even when business owners add private equity correctly, they often mess up the allocation guidance.
The research shows*51% of interested participants would allocate less than 10% of workplace retirement assets to private assets, while 36% would allocate 10-15%*. These are reasonable ranges, but I see plans that either offer no guidance or suggest allocations that are way too aggressive.
Common allocation mistakes:

  • All-or-nothing thinking(either 0% or 25%+)
  • One-size-fits-all recommendations
  • Ignoring age and risk tolerance differences Better approach:Provide age-based allocation models. A 25-year-old might reasonably allocate 10-15% to private equity, while someone nearing retirement should probably stay under 5%. Make the guidance clear and conservative.

Mistake #5: Falling for the Fee Justification Trap

Private equity fees are*substantially higherthan traditional investments. I've seen business owners justify these fees by pointing to potential returns, but that's backwards thinking.
Here's the reality:
Private equity accounted for around 10% of the equity market and private credit for 7% of the private debt market in 2023*. You're paying premium fees for what's becoming a more mainstream asset class.
The fee trap looks like this:

  • Management fees of 2% annually
  • Carried interest of 20% on profits
  • Additional transaction and monitoring fees
  • Hidden costsfrom illiquidity and complexity Smart approach:Calculate the total cost of ownership before adding any private equity option. Compare net returns (after all fees) to simpler alternatives. Sometimes a low-cost diversified portfolio beats expensive private equity, even if the gross returns look better.

What This Means for Your 401(k) Strategy

The demand is real.77% of participants willing to invest in private assets would increase their retirement plan contributionsif these options were available. That's a powerful retention and recruitment tool.
But getting it wrong creates liability and employee dissatisfaction. Here's my framework for business owners considering private equity in their 401(k)s:

Start With These Questions

  • Do we have strong investment education programs in place?
  • Are our employees sophisticated enough to understand illiquid investments?
  • Can we justify the additional costs and complexity?
  • Do we have fiduciary expertise to oversee these investments?

If You Move Forward

  • Keep allocations conservative(5-15% maximum)
  • Provide extensive education and clear guidance
  • Work with experienced fiduciary advisors
  • Monitor performance net of all fees
  • Have an exit strategy if options underperform

The Bottom Line

Private equity in 401(k)s isn't inherently good or bad. It's a tool that can work well for the right companies with the right approach and the right employee education.
But I've seen too many business owners rush into complex investment options without thinking through the implications. The*over 900 independent retirement and wealth-management firms acquired by private-equity-backed companies in the past decade*shows how much money is chasing this space, which should make you extra careful about who you're working with.
Your employees' retirement security is too important for shortcuts or sales pitches. Get the strategy right first, then worry about implementation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I add private equity options to my company's 401(k) plan?It depends on your employee sophistication, plan size, and ability to provide proper education. Start by surveying employee interest and assessing their investment knowledge. Private equity can be appropriate for larger plans with educated participants, but it's not suitable for every company.What percentage of a 401(k) should be allocated to private equity?Research shows most interested participants would allocate 10-15% or less. I recommend conservative allocations of 5-15% maximum, with lower percentages for employees nearing retirement. Age and risk tolerance should drive individual allocation decisions.How do I explain private equity to my employees?Focus on the key characteristics: higher potential returns, higher fees, and limited liquidity. Use simple analogies and avoid jargon. Most importantly, explain when private equity makes sense (long-term investors comfortable with illiquidity) and when it doesn't (near-retirees or risk-averse investors).What are the main risks of private equity in 401(k)s?The biggest risks are illiquidity (money tied up for years), high fees that eat into returns, complexity that confuses participants, and potential underperformance versus simpler alternatives. There's also fiduciary risk if the options aren't properly vetted and monitored.How do private equity fees compare to traditional 401(k) investments?Private equity typically charges 2% annual management fees plus 20% carried interest on profits, compared to 0.02-0.50% for index funds. These higher fees must be justified by meaningfully better net returns, which isn't always the case based on long-term studies.

If this analysis would be useful for your 401(k) strategy, it might be worth a conversation about how these concepts apply to your specific situation:https://pnwadvisory.com/exit-planning/?utm_source=blog&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=organic
This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consult with qualified professionals for guidance tailored to your specific situation. Doug may provide services and conduct business as Pinnacle Wealth Advisory with advisory services offered through SB Advisory, LLC.

Top comments (0)