Hiring a banker, a CPA, and an estate attorney does not give you a coordinated exit team. It gives you three separate relationships that only look coordinated if you force them to be. If you are wondering how to*coordinate advisors when selling a business*, the honest answer is that coordination is a set of habits, not a hire. In decades of watching business sales unfold, I have seen good individual advisors produce a bad collective result, simply because nobody made them talk to each other before the decisions that mattered most were already locked in.
If you own a business and you already have a banker, a CPA, and an attorney lined up for your sale, this post is for you.
Key Takeaways
- Three excellent advisors do not automatically add up to one coordinated team.
- Industry surveys, including work published by the Exit Planning Institute, have repeatedly found that a majority of owners report some degree of regret after selling, and that most did not have a written transition plan in place. Figures vary by survey and year.
- An advisor who nominates themselves as 'the quarterback' is not automatically a red flag, but it deserves a second look.
- Real coordination has three concrete features: one shared source of truth, a standing call, and a named owner for each decision.
- The wealth advisor is usually the only person still in the room a year after closing. That matters more than it sounds like it should.
The Frame: Three Good Advisors, Zero Coordination
Here is what actually happens on most deals. An owner hires a banker to run the sale process. Somewhere along the way, a CPA gets pulled in to handle tax questions. An estate attorney shows up, often late, to talk about what happens to the proceeds. Each of these people is good at their job. None of them were hired as a team.
Why This Is a Structural Problem, Not a Talent Problem
This is not a competence problem. It is a structure problem. Each advisor has a different fee model, a different timeline, and a different definition of success. The banker wants to close the deal. The CPA wants to minimize transaction-year tax. The attorney wants clean legal language. None of those goals is wrong, but none of them, alone, protects the owner's long-term financial picture.
What Owner-Readiness Research Says About Regret
The Exit Planning Institute has published survey research in this area for several years, and the directional finding has been consistent: a majority of owners report some degree of regret after selling, and most did not have a written transition plan in place. I am not going to repeat a precise percentage here, because the exact figure varies by survey year and methodology, and I would rather you read the source study yourself than take my summary as the final word. A documented plan is not paperwork for its own sake. It is the mechanism that forces advisors to see the whole picture instead of just their slice of it.
The Self-Appointed Quarterback Problem
Search this topic and you will find the same advice everywhere: hire a wealth advisor to quarterback your deal team. Firms like BNY Wealth and others make this pitch often, and even large institutional practices likeDeloitte Private position their exit advisory work around integrated delivery across tax, legal, and deal-execution disciplinesfor the same reason. It is not wrong that someone needs to hold the pieces together. But an advisor who nominates themselves for that role, without being asked, deserves a second look.
Why Owners Are Right to Be Skeptical
I do not pitch myself as the quarterback of anyone's deal team, and I would tell you to be cautious of anyone who does it automatically. Self-nomination often protects the advisor's own relationship, not the owner's outcome. Sophisticated owners have learned to ask a different question.
What to Ask Instead of Who Is in Charge
Instead of asking who is in charge, ask this: who is accountable for making sure the CPA, the attorney, and the banker are actually looking at the same numbers, on the same day, before a decision gets made. That question exposes whether you have a team or three separate vendors.
What Real Coordination Actually Looks Like
Coordination is not a feeling. It is a small number of concrete habits. Here is what I look for, and what I recommend any owner demand from their existing advisors, regardless of who ends up running point. This is not a new observation in financial advisory practice management generally:research on multi-advisor teamsfinds that ad hoc coordination and duplicated meetings, not a lack of individual skill, is what erodes a team's effectiveness once more than a couple of people are involved. That research focuses on internal advisory team structures rather than cross-firm exit deal teams specifically, but the underlying dynamic, coordination gaps driven by structure rather than skill, tracks with what I see across banker-CPA-attorney deal teams as well.
One Shared Source of Truth on Deal Terms
Everyone on the team, the banker, the CPA, the attorney, and the wealth advisor, should be looking at the same document for deal terms. Not three separate summaries. One document. This matters most for details likeworking capital adjustments that get missed without a shared source of truth. Those adjustments are exactly the kind of deal-term detail that quietly costs owners money when nobody is watching the whole board.
A Standing Call, Not an As-Needed One
As-needed calls do not happen when they are needed most. A standing 30-minute call, on the calendar every week or two, forces the conversation to happen even when nobody thinks they have news. This does add coordination overhead, and in some cases additional billable time from your advisors, so weigh that against the cost of the gaps it prevents. The best coordination I have seen happens on calls nobody wanted to schedule but everyone showed up to anyway.
Naming Who Owns What, Before the LOI Stage
By the time you sign a letter of intent,the highest-leverage structuring decisions are already locked in. Entity structure, holding-company layers, and installment-sale mechanics are often far more effective to address before signing an LOI than after, though the right approach depends on your specific facts and should be worked through with your own CPA and attorney. If nobody has explicitly named who owns which decision before that point, your options are already narrowing.
The Analogy
Think of it like building a house in Texas with a foundation crew, a framing crew, and an electrician, all hired separately, none of whom have seen each other's blueprints. Each crew does solid work. But if the electrician does not know where the foundation crew ran the plumbing, you get a wall that has to be torn open later. An exit team without coordination works the same way. Each advisor does good work in isolation. The tear-open moment just happens eighteen months after closing instead of during construction.
The Fix
- Ask each advisor directly who they expect to coordinate the group, and see if the answers match.
- Set a standing call before the LOI stage, not after.
- Build one shared deal-terms document everyone can see and edit.
- Name, in writing, who owns post-close items like earnout calculations and seller-note compliance.
- Bring your wealth advisor into early conversations, not just the closing dinner.
- Ask what happens to the relationship with each advisor after the wire clears.
The Point
Coordination is not about finding the right person to be in charge. It is about building habits that force information to move between advisors before decisions get made instead of after. Hypothetical example: a business owner with $8M in expected proceeds might have a CPA who structures the deal to minimize transaction-year tax, without realizing that structure creates a worse funding outcome for the trust the owner intends to set up eighteen months later. Nobody flagged the interaction because nobody was looking at both pieces at once.*This example is hypothetical and for illustrative purposes only. It does not represent an actual client, transaction, or outcome. Actual results depend on individual facts and circumstances and will differ.*That is the coordination gap, and it is fixable with the right habits, not a new hire.
The Gap Nobody Talks About: After the Wire Clears
The CPA is usually done when the return is filed. The M&A attorney is usually done when the purchase agreement is signed. The wealth advisor is often the only person from the original team still in the room a year later, managing the proceeds and watching decisions made during diligence turn into real financial-planning consequences. That is not a reason to hand anyone the quarterback title upfront. It is a reason to think, early, about who is still accountable to you after everyone else has moved on. For more on what actually goes wrong in that window, seewhat actually goes wrong in the first 100 days after the wire clears.
When to Start Building This, and With Whom
The earlier you build these habits, the more structuring options stay open. Waiting until you have a signed LOI to introduce your wealth advisor to your CPA means the highest-leverage decisions are already behind you. Start the shared document and the standing call the moment you have more than one advisor engaged, even if a sale is still a year or two away.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who should coordinate my exit planning team?There is no single correct answer, and be cautious of any advisor who assumes the role without being asked. What matters more than the title is whether the group has a shared deal-terms document, a standing call, and named ownership for post-close items.Do I need a wealth advisor before I have a buyer?In my experience, bringing a wealth advisor in early, well before a signed letter of intent, helps surface structuring decisions that are much harder to unwind once the deal terms are locked in.What happens to my advisory team after the sale closes?Typically the CPA's engagement ends once the transaction-year return is filed and the attorney's role ends once the purchase agreement is signed. The wealth advisor is usually the team member still active, managing the proceeds and monitoring earnout or seller-note compliance.How do I know if my advisors are actually coordinating or just billing separately?Ask if they are working from one shared document on deal terms, meeting on a standing schedule rather than only as needed, and can each name who owns specific post-close responsibilities. If the answers are vague, they are likely working in silos.Is it a red flag if an advisor wants to run the whole process?Not automatically, but it is worth a closer look. An advisor volunteering to run point can be helpful, or it can be protecting their own fee relationship rather than solving the coordination problem. Ask how they propose to keep the other advisors informed, specifically.What's the difference between a deal team and a wealth planning team?The deal team, banker, attorney, and often the CPA, focuses on getting the transaction closed on favorable terms. The wealth planning team focuses on what happens to the proceeds for decades afterward, including tax-efficient diversification, estate structuring, and charitable strategy. Ideally these teams overlap and communicate well before closing.
Work with Pinnacle Wealth Advisory
If you are assembling or already working with an exit team and want a second look at whether real coordination is happening, or you want a wealth planning perspective brought into the conversation earlier rather than later, it might be worth a conversation. Learn more aboutexit planningat Pinnacle Wealth Advisory.
Estate and tax mechanics referenced here are general in nature. Always consult your own CPA and attorney for guidance specific to your entity structure and jurisdiction, since PNWA is an investment adviser, not a law or accounting firm.
Results vary based on individual circumstances. Specific figures are illustrative, not guarantees of outcomes. Doug Greenberg is an investment adviser representative of SB Advisory LLC, a registered investment adviser. This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consult with qualified professionals for guidance tailored to your specific situation. Doug may provide services and conduct business as Pinnacle Wealth Advisory with advisory services offered through SB Advisory, LLC.
Top comments (0)