As AI systems continue to evolve with capabilities like generative models, we must consider the implications of AI-generated content that convincingly mimics the style of human creators. A question worth exploring is: What responsibilities do the developers of these systems bear in relation to intellectual property law, when AI-generated art that could be mistaken for the work of a human artist is created, sold, or exhibited, without the original creator being explicitly credited or compensated? Is the value of creative output ultimately tied to the physical or intellectual 'labor' of the human being who first conceived it, or does our definition of creativity need to adapt to the new paradigm of AI-driven generative art?
Publicado automáticamente
Top comments (0)