The modern developer’s dilemma
In the first two months of 2026, I put 3 very different projects into production, but with one thing in common: they were all monoliths.
At the moment, I’ve decided to manage the deployment of the three projects using three different approaches.
1) Laravel + Render + Neon: The "Free Tier" Paradise
Laravel is a fantastic framework, but it can be heavy for free plans. I had built a time tracking app in the last months of 2025 to study inertia.js, but in a very short time it became an indispensable tool for me, and I decided to put it into production on a public server.
For my private apps I often use free or almost free services (e.g. Netlify with blobs or serverless db), but we know that a Laravel app is as solid as it is complex and heavy.
And then Render appeared on my path: an excellent service, available on a free plan.
Right away I ran into the two real limitations:
the first is the cold start, which could be ‘solved’ by setting up a simple external cron job that pings the URL every few minutes. But I decided not to worry about it because for a personal app it’s not a drama to wait a few seconds at startup.
the second is that their free databases expire after 90 days. The solution? Neon.tech (PostgreSQL Serverless). An amazing combo, free and unstoppable. Perfect for a private use only app, but one to which I can delegate very important tasks and work with large amounts of data.
2) Flask + Railway: The Power of Containers (and the Canvas)
I’ve always used Flask to create microservices on the fly. We all know how fast, powerful, and versatile it is. Recently I built a SaaS that I really wanted to validate: little time for development, even less for deployment.
I decided to cut corners where I could, and from the very beginning I used alpine.js on the frontend, with the intention of migrating to Vue js. Then after a frontend modularization test of the existing setup using Gemini CLI and Jinja2, I found myself convinced by the monolithic architecture I had just achieved, and I decided to spend time optimizing it.
And then I asked myself: what about deployment? How do we behave when something that starts as a simple service becomes a monolith?
Still Railway. The service I’ve always used for my microservices. You connect the repo, it reads the requirements and creates the container. All of this with pressy pay-as-you-go on resource usage.
All of this while keeping the structure totally granular: if tomorrow I wanted to add a Redis worker to manage message queues in Flask, on Railway I can do it in 2 seconds by adding a "node" to the canvas.
3) The Offers Portal on a Hostinger VPS: When You Need Brute Force
Here we shift gears. A complex offers portal with thousands of records and continuous updates cannot run on a free plan or an inexpensive PaaS.
When the required resources go beyond 2GB of RAM and you need many background workers, PaaS costs explode.
On Hostinger, with 10€-15€, I have a machine all to myself. On Railway, the same resource consumption would cost me triple.
Moreover, I have total control: I can install whatever I want, optimize Nginx for SEO, and manage backups however I prefer.
The downside: I have to manage security, operating system updates, and firewall configuration myself. That is the price of freedom.
Conclusion: Which One Should You Choose?
Need to validate an idea? Go with Railway.
Do you have a personal but complex app and want peace of mind? Render.
Is the project serious, heavy, and you want to optimize costs? Get your hands dirty on a VPS.
Top comments (0)