In the world of microservices, communication between systems needs to be efficient, secure, and well-defined. That’s where gRPC comes in—a modern framework created by Google that’s gaining traction among architects and backend developers.
What is gRPC?
It’s a modern alternative to REST based on Remote Procedure Calls (RPC), using:
HTTP/2: multiplexing, lower latency, and streaming support
Protocol Buffers (Protobuf): lightweight, fast binary serialization
Service contracts (.proto files): strongly typed, auto-generate code in multiple languages
Why we adopted gRPC in our .NET project
We were dealing with microservices that required:
Low latency data exchange (JSON was too heavy)
Guaranteed contracts between different services
Bidirectional communication (client/server streaming)
With gRPC, we achieved:
- Payload reduction by up to 70%
- Eliminated contract mismatches between services
- Stable real-time streaming
- Easy integration with Load Balancer + Traefik
Tech stack used:
.NET 8
gRPC with C# (both code-first and contract-first with .proto)
Docker + Docker Compose
Traefik as reverse proxy with HTTP/2 support
Observability with OpenTelemetry
| Feature | REST | gRPC |
|---|---|---|
| Protocol | HTTP/1.1 | HTTP/2 |
| Data format | JSON | Protobuf (binary) |
| Performance | Medium | High |
| Contract | Swagger/OpenAPI (opt) | Protobuf (mandatory) |
| Streaming | Limited | Bidirectional |
| Browser support | Full | Limited (not native) |
Ideal scenarios for gRPC:
High-volume internal systems
Microservice communication
Real-time processes (logs, chat, event queues)
Cross-stack backend integrations (e.g., Java ↔ .NET)
Cautions when using gRPC:
Browsers don’t natively support gRPC (use gRPC-Web as a workaround)
Debugging can be more complex than REST
Versioning requires careful design (Protobuf best practices)
Final tip:
If you want efficiency, standardization, and scalability, gRPC is worth trying. But remember: it’s not a direct REST replacement, rather a powerful tool for specific use cases.
Top comments (0)