Developers spend a surprising amount of time switching between their editor, browser, documentation, terminal, and other tools just to find an answer to a simple question.
Sometimes the problem isn't that we don't know how to solve something. It's that finding the right information interrupts the flow of actually solving it.
I've been exploring a different approach: using an AI assistant that can work alongside the information already visible on your computer instead of constantly copying and pasting context between applications.
The context-switching problem
Imagine you're working on a JavaScript project and encounter an unfamiliar error.
The traditional workflow might look something like this:
- Stop working on the code.
- Open a browser.
- Search for the error.
- Read several results.
- Copy relevant information.
- Return to the editor.
- Try a solution.
- Repeat if it doesn't work.
None of these steps is particularly difficult, but together they create friction.
The same thing happens when learning a new framework, reviewing documentation, preparing for a technical discussion, or trying to understand an unfamiliar concept.
What if the information came to you instead?
This is where screen-aware AI assistants become interesting.
Instead of manually explaining everything you're looking at, an assistant can use the information currently available on your computer as context and provide an answer through another device.
For example, imagine having a coding tutorial or technical documentation open on your computer and being able to ask a question about what you're seeing without constantly switching windows.
The goal isn't to replace the developer's thinking.
It's to reduce the amount of mechanical work involved in getting useful information.
*Keeping the workflow simple
*
One interesting implementation I've come across is Secondline.
Secondline takes a slightly different approach to interacting with an AI assistant. The computer handles the relevant screen/session context, while answers can be displayed privately on a paired phone.
For Windows, the desktop application handles screen capture, sessions, PC audio, and phone pairing. On Mac, the workflow uses a browser extension together with a phone bridge.
The concept is particularly interesting from a UX perspective because it separates the place where context exists from the place where the answer is displayed.
Why this matters for developers
There are several situations where reducing context switching can be useful:
Learning
When learning a new programming language or framework, developers constantly encounter unfamiliar terminology.
Being able to ask questions about the material you're currently working through can make the learning process more interactive.
Debugging
Debugging often involves moving between logs, documentation, source code, and search results.
Reducing those transitions can help keep attention on the actual problem.
Technical research
Developers frequently have multiple sources open simultaneously. An assistant that can work with the current context can potentially make research more efficient.
Productivity
Small interruptions add up. Even a few unnecessary context switches throughout an hour can make focused work harder.
*AI should reduce friction, not thinking
*
One thing I think is important with AI developer tools is that convenience shouldn't come at the expense of understanding.
The best use of an AI assistant isn't simply:
"Give me the answer."
It's also:
"Help me understand why this is the answer."
Developers still need to verify suggestions, understand the underlying concepts, test code, and make the final decisions themselves.
AI is most useful when it helps remove repetitive friction while keeping the human in control of the work.
The bigger direction
We're moving toward interfaces where AI isn't necessarily another website or another tab.
Instead, AI can become part of the workflow itself.
The interesting question isn't just how intelligent an AI model can become.
It's also:
How can we make AI fit naturally into the way people already work?
For developers, that could mean less copying and pasting, fewer context switches, and more time spent actually building.
I'm curious what other developers think: Would you prefer an AI assistant that lives inside your development environment, or one that works alongside your existing workflow?
Top comments (0)