A Developer's Honest Take on Why the Current System Fails Real Innovation
I started my AI-SymDev journey in early 2025, and because I'm apparently incapable of starting small, I dove straight into building a massive knitting and crochet design assistant software with 25+ features and custom ML backend. While working on this behemoth, I decided to extract one feature—a yarn pricing calculator—and turn it into my first Android app to test the waters of mobile development.
The development part? Straightforward. Converting my Java-React code to Kotlin, polishing the UI, and creating a production-ready app took about a week and a half. The result was YarnCraft: an elegant tool for yarn crafters with three languages, API integration with major yarn retailers, statistics tracking, and features built by an actual knitter for actual knitters.
Then I met Google Play's validation process.
The Developer Permission Dance
First, you need Google Play Developer permission—a process that's quirky but manageable. Check. Upload your APK bundle and wait for approval. Simple enough. Then comes the surprise: the "closed testing" requirement.
You need 12 people to download your app and keep it installed for 14 consecutive days before you can even apply for public release. Sounds reasonable in theory. The execution? A nightmare.
The User Experience Disaster
Here's what Google doesn't tell you about closed testing:
The Access Maze: Users must provide their email addresses so you can add them to a testing list. They receive a link, but here's the catch—they need "developer mode" enabled in their Google Play Store to access your app. This involves navigating buried settings that most users have never heard of.
** The Email Dilemma:** Would you give your email to a stranger claiming they need it for app testing? Most sensible people wouldn't. It sounds like a scam because, frankly, the process is so convoluted it resembles one.
When Friends and Family Become "Testers"
Since strangers won't jump through these hoops, you turn to friends and family. This creates a fundamental problem: your "testers" have no genuine interest in your app.
My friend's 15-year-old daughter stayed up until 1:00 am trying to figure out developer mode activation. She doesn't knit. She doesn't know what angora yarn is. She downloaded the app, installed it, and forgot it existed—exactly what Google's algorithm interprets as poor engagement.
My app has been rejected twice for "insufficient testing" and low user engagement. How can I get meaningful feedback from users who have zero interest in yarn crafting?
The Shadow Game
YouTube tutorials suggest a workaround: upload minor updates every few days—move a button, change a font—to create the illusion of active bug fixing. Google interprets this activity as improvement and may approve your app.
This is absurd. I'm wasting development time pretending to fix problems that don't exist, just to satisfy an algorithm that mistakes busy work for quality improvement.
The Quality Paradox
Google claims this process ensures "app quality." Yet the Play Store is flooded with broken, useless applications. The current system evaluates apps based on user retention metrics rather than code quality, functionality, or genuine utility.
My app works perfectly. It solves real problems for real users. But it's trapped in validation limbo because the testing process attracts only disinterested testers who naturally exhibit poor engagement.
Beyond the Walled Garden
Here's the reality check: for subscription services or ad revenue integration, you don't need Google Play Store approval. You can distribute directly, collect payments through established processors, and serve users without navigating Google's arbitrary obstacles.
The Play Store offers discoverability, but at what cost? When the validation process actively prevents good apps from reaching users while allowing broken ones to proliferate, the system has lost sight of its purpose.
The Real Question
Do we really need Google Play validation? For developers building genuine solutions to real problems, the current process creates more barriers than benefits. It prioritizes metrics over merit and forces developers to game systems rather than focus on creating value.
I built YarnCraft to solve actual problems for yarn crafters. The app works. Users who actually need it find it valuable. But Google's process requires me to pretend otherwise, spending weeks manipulating meaningless engagement metrics instead of developing features that matter.
Perhaps it's time to question whether jumping through these hoops is worth it—or if there are better ways to connect real solutions with real users.
_ What's your experience with app store validation processes? Have you found better alternatives for reaching your target audience? Share your thoughts in the comments. _
Top comments (0)