Routing. The thing that makes single-page apps feel like real websites. Without it, your app would be one glorified, fancy scroll bar. Today, we're diving deep into the world of React routing versus Next.js routing, specifically looking at some shiny new features from Next.js App Router.
Both React and Next.js offer routing solutions, but as you'll soon see, these two approaches differ like day and night. One involves a bit more boilerplate, while the other is all about developer happiness. Let’s break down the good, the bad, and the “why are we still doing this?” moments.
React Routing: More Work, More Control
React, being a library and not a full-fledged framework, gives you all the control—and by that, I mean all the work. If you’re using React Router (the go-to routing library for React apps), be prepared to define everything yourself.
Example: A Simple React Router Setup
// App.tsx
import { BrowserRouter as Router, Route, Routes } from 'react-router-dom';
import Home from './pages/Home';
import About from './pages/About';
function App() {
return (
<Router>
<Routes>
<Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
<Route path="/about" element={<About />} />
</Routes>
</Router>
);
}
export default App;
If you’re familiar with this setup, you know that with great power comes great boilerplate. React Router allows you to define your paths, components, and nested routes manually. You’ll need to set up the <Router> component around your app and manage routes and links manually.
What do you get? Flexibility. You can configure everything exactly how you want it. Want dynamic routes? Go ahead. Need nested routing? You got it. Want to feel like you’re writing routing code until the end of time? Absolutely!
Next.js: Routing That Just Works
Next.js, being a framework, takes away much of that boilerplate. It handles routing automatically based on the file structure. Yes, you read that right: no <Router> component, no manually defining paths. Just create a folder structure, and Next.js will handle the rest. You’ll even get built-in optimizations, SSR (Server-Side Rendering), and all the cool stuff.
Example: Next.js App Router
In Next.js, especially with the App Router, routing has been further streamlined. Here’s how you can define routes with minimal code:
// app/page.tsx (This is the homepage route)
export default function Home() {
return <h1>Welcome to the homepage!</h1>;
}
// app/about/page.tsx (This is the about page route)
export default function About() {
return <h1>About Us</h1>;
}
That’s it. No router setup required—Next.js takes care of it under the hood. Want to add dynamic routes? Just name your files with square brackets:
// app/products/[id]/page.tsx (Dynamic route)
export default function Product({ params }) {
return <h1>Product ID: {params.id}</h1>;
}
Key Features of Next.js' App Router
-
File-based routing: The file/folder structure drives the routes. If it's in the
app/directory, it's a route. -
Dynamic routes: Easy as naming a file
[id]/page.tsx. - Layouts and templates: With App Router, you can now have layouts and templates that allow for reusable components across different routes.
For example, having a layout.tsx file in any folder will apply that layout to all routes within that folder.
// app/layout.tsx (Shared layout for all pages)
export default function RootLayout({ children }) {
return (
<html>
<body>
<nav>/* navigation */</nav>
{children}
</body>
</html>
);
}
Summarizing the Key Differences Between React and Next.js Routing
Now that we’ve seen some code, let’s talk about the differences between these two approaches. While React Router gives you full control, Next.js routing is about developer productivity.
| Feature | React Router (React) | Next.js (App Router) |
|---|---|---|
| Router Setup | Requires <Router> and manual setup |
Automatic based on folder structure |
| Dynamic Routing | Manual with <Route> and path parameters |
Automatic with file naming conventions |
| Nested Routes | Defined manually in JSX | Inferred from folder structure |
| Layouts | Manual, not built-in | Built-in with layout.tsx files |
| Data Fetching | Handled separately (useEffect, SWR, etc.) | Built-in with Next.js API routes or Server Components |
| SEO Optimization | Custom configuration required | Automatic SEO and performance enhancements |
| SSR/SSG | Not built-in, requires additional libraries | Fully supported out of the box |
Which One Should You Use?
If you want full control and don’t mind handling every detail, React Router is for you. It’s like cooking from scratch—labor-intensive but rewarding.
If you want a routing system that just works out of the box, Next.js is your best friend. Why reinvent the wheel when you can have a Tesla? Especially with Next.js, App Router streamlines development like never before.
Conclusion: The Verdict
So, React Router gives you control, but at what cost? Boilerplate. And let's face it, managing routes manually is so 2015. With Next.js, especially the new App Router, routing is simplified to the point where you can focus more on building your app, not wiring it up.
In other words, Next.js is like hiring someone to do your grocery shopping while you relax—React Router, on the other hand, is you, standing in line with a full cart wondering why you decided to make a ten-course meal from scratch.
The choice is yours, but with Next.js, the scales are tipping heavily towards effortless productivity.
Top comments (0)