"We need to hire an IT team."
I hear this from companies between 30 and 150 employees. Usually they're wrong — not because they don't need IT help, but because the IT help they need doesn't require a team.
The assumption comes from a reasonable place. The company has grown. Systems are creaking. The founder is no longer the right person to handle this. Someone needs to own it. The instinct is to hire a department.
But there's a step worth taking before that: figuring out what you actually need.
What a Single Experienced IT Partner Covers
Here is what I cover for the companies I work with, typically without a team:
Website and web applications. Building, maintaining, and updating your public presence and customer-facing tools. This includes the work most agencies charge separately for every time something needs to change.
Server infrastructure. Hosting, databases, backups, uptime. Making sure the things that need to run keep running, and that when something fails there is a recovery procedure.
Integrations. Your CRM, accounting software, e-commerce platform, and logistics system all need to share data. Connecting them — and keeping those connections working as vendors update their APIs — is ongoing work that saves your team significant time every week.
Automation. When I audited Pikkuna's order pipeline, managers were spending 15–30 minutes per order copying data between systems by hand. After automation, the same process takes under 2 minutes with no human involvement. That kind of work — identifying what is manual and making it not manual — is one of the highest-value things an experienced IT partner does.
AI tools. Not the hype version. Practical applications that save time or improve decisions. A customer support chatbot that handles 70% of incoming tickets without a human. A document classifier that processes paperwork your team used to handle manually.
Security. Access management, basic hardening, ensuring that people who left the company two years ago don't still have active logins. Not compliance engineering for a bank — practical security for a company that uses technology to run its business.
Technical decision-making. When a vendor recommends something, when you're choosing a new tool, when a developer proposes an architecture — you need someone to evaluate that recommendation. Someone who has seen enough systems to know which suggestions are good and which ones will cause problems in 18 months. This is the value of fractional CTO coverage — technical judgment that scales with your needs, not your payroll.
slug="fractional-cto"
text="Before you hire an IT team, let's figure out whether you actually need one. For most companies between 30 and 150 people, one experienced IT partner covers the full functional scope — at a fraction of the cost."
/>
What a Solo IT Partner Cannot Replace
I'll be direct about the limits, because pretending they don't exist wastes everyone's time.
A dedicated in-house helpdesk makes sense if you have 200+ people and laptops and printers are breaking constantly. That's a volume problem that requires physical presence and dedicated staffing.
A dedicated security team makes sense if you're in an industry with strict compliance requirements — banking, healthcare, anything handling sensitive personal data at scale. Those environments need specialists who do nothing but security.
An internal product team makes sense if software is your core product — if you're a SaaS company and the application you're building is the business itself, not the infrastructure that runs it.
The distinction matters: IT as infrastructure versus IT as product. If you use technology to run your business, a senior IT partner handles it. If you're in the business of building technology, you need a product team.
The Cost Math
An in-house IT department of three to five people — which is what companies at this stage often imagine building — runs €200,000 to €400,000 per year. That's salaries, employer costs, benefits, equipment, onboarding time, and the management overhead of having five more people to coordinate.
And those five people will each be a specialist in something. You'll have someone who knows the network, someone who knows the CRM, someone who handles end-user support. You'll also have gaps in whatever none of them know, plus the coordination cost of getting them to work together.
A senior IT partner on retainer covers a broader functional scope than any individual employee — and at a fraction of the cost. For the range of companies I'm describing, the economics aren't close.
Who This Actually Works For
Companies where IT is infrastructure, not product. You use technology to run your business, but you're not in the business of building technology.
You have between 30 and 150 employees. Your systems are getting more complex as you grow. You've outgrown ad-hoc solutions but you're not yet at the size where a full internal department makes financial sense.
You need someone who can own the technical side, think ahead, and tell you honestly when a decision is good and when it isn't — without the overhead of managing a team.
That is the gap a single experienced partner fills. For most companies at this stage, it's the right answer. If you're not sure what the full scope of that gap is yet, a first-week IT audit is usually the fastest way to find out. And if your systems have grown to the point where nobody is sure who's responsible for them, this post on IT ownership describes exactly what that costs.
If you're about to hire IT staff, it's worth having one conversation first. Let's look at what you actually need before you build a department — the first call costs nothing, and it usually changes the picture.
Top comments (0)