On a look-through of all 98 holdings as of 9 September 2026, 100% of SCHD's weight sits inside VTI. Next to a total-market fund, Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF adds almost no new companies — it re-weights ones you already own.
Every figure here is dated 9 September 2026. ETF Copilot recomputes them daily, so the current numbers are on the live SCHD look-through.
I worked through SCHD's holdings and compared them against a thousand-plus US-listed equity ETFs. Three findings, none of which appears on any published fund profile I could find.
SCHD, as of 9 September 2026
| Share of SCHD's weight already inside VTI | 100% — 96 of its 98 companies are in both |
| Share of VTI inside SCHD | 7% |
| Trailing P/E of its holdings | 19.0× — the cheapest of its four largest peers |
| Against its own record since 2017 | More expensive than 82% of its monthly readings |
| Companies carrying half the fund | 13, of 98 holdings |
How much does SCHD overlap with VTI?
100% of SCHD's weight sits inside VTI as of 9 September 2026 — 96 of its 98 companies are in both, and the two that are not are too small to move the rounding. Against VT it is 99%, against VYM 99%, and against SCHX 97%. Going the other way, only 7% of VTI is inside SCHD — it sits inside the broad fund rather than beside it.
| SCHD's weight already held by | Share |
|---|---|
| VTI | 100% |
| VT | 99% |
| VYM | 99% |
| SCHX | 97% |
| VIG | 55% |
That last row is why the measure is worth trusting. VIG is the same category and the same dividend framing, and it holds only 55% of SCHD — VIG and SCHD are genuinely different portfolios; SCHD and VTI are largely the same one, re-weighted. The calculation discriminates rather than simply debunking everything it touches.
What does SCHD add to a portfolio that already holds VTI?
A tilt in weighting, not additional diversification: as of 9 September 2026, 100% of SCHD's weight is inside VTI, so SCHD adds essentially no companies that are not already in VTI. Whether a dividend-quality tilt is worth having is a separate question, and a reasonable one. It is just not a diversification question.
Is SCHD expensive right now?
Both answers are true at once, and this is the finding I care about most.
Against its peers, SCHD is cheap. Rolling every holding's trailing earnings up to fund level, SCHD traded at 19.0× trailing earnings on 9 September 2026 — the cheapest of its four largest peers, which run up to 25.3×.
| Fund | Trailing P/E, 9 Sep 2026 | Its own median | More expensive than |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCHD | 19.0× | 17.1× | 82% |
| VYM | 20.7× | 17.4× | 91% |
| DGRO | 22.6× | 19.0× | 92% |
| CGDV | 25.2× | 25.0× | 52% |
| VIG | 25.3× | 23.4× | 80% |
"More expensive than" is the share of that fund's own monthly readings sitting below today's.
Against itself, SCHD is expensive. As of 9 September 2026, SCHD's trailing P/E of 19.0× is more expensive than 82% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017 — its median over that period is 17.1×.
Funds screening for dividend growth select companies the market already prices richly, so the whole peer group re-rates together: four of the five are more expensive than at least 80% of their own history. The comparison table moves as one and tells you nothing about level.
Only one of those two numbers appears on a typical comparison table. The peer view and the historical view point in opposite directions, and the view almost everyone uses is the one that cannot see it.
Is SCHD concentrated?
Yes — 13 of SCHD's 98 companies carry half the fund, and its ten largest are 42% of it, as of 9 September 2026. On effective holdings — the equally-weighted count that would produce the same concentration — SCHD behaves like a 34-stock portfolio, more concentrated than 86% of US dividend funds.
"98 holdings" is true and tells you almost nothing.
Why none of this is on a fact sheet
Not because anyone is hiding it. Each of these figures requires looking through the fund to the companies underneath, mapping those companies to a stable identity so they can be matched across funds, and recomputing as holdings change. A fact sheet is a snapshot of one fund; these are relationships between funds, and they move.
On ETF Copilot's nightly recomputation across the US-listed equity universe — which is where the peer-group and percentile figures above come from — doing this once for one fund is an afternoon's work. Doing it every night for all of them is the part that took a while.
Check it on any pair you own
Take two funds you own together and ask what share of the smaller one's weight already sits inside the larger. Above 95% and you own one position with extra steps. At 55%, like SCHD against VIG, you own two things.
I build ETF Copilot (https://etf-copilot.com), disclosing that it's mine. Every figure above is from its nightly recomputation, dated 9 September 2026, and is checkable without an account on the live SCHD look-through, which always carries the current numbers.
Top comments (0)