Skip to content
loading...

re: Code Coverage is Useless VIEW POST

TOP OF THREAD FULL DISCUSSION
re: I agree with your points. I usually define code coverage as an indicator, i.e. a metric as you wrote there. It hints us about the team intentions. ...
 

Yep! It's all about the context of the application. Some applications can get away with 20% coverage, some might require 80%. After that, we just want to monitor whether or not coverage is decreasing or increasing.

It's a little silly to decree that a small project that's currently running fine, but sitting at 20% coverage, needs an all hands on deck initiative to up the coverage to some arbitrary number.

code of conduct - report abuse