I believe that the reactive form library in Angular is one of the most powerful tools in the framework. Developers can create performant and reactive forms that provide great UI/UX. One part of the reactive form toolkit that I think people often overlook is creating custom validators. In this article I show how to create a custom password field validator and how to use it.
Reactive forms create objects that all inherit from the same AbstractControl. The AbstractControl has an errors object property, which is where I can get or set validation errors for the form or particular control. This errors object contains key value pairs. When using the default built-in validation, these key value pairs are predefined with specific (often boolean) values. That means that I would need to evaluate the error value and decide what error message to show the user. However, it is possible to create custom validators, and they can return key value pairs with error message values instead of booleans. This means that I can set up reusable validators to both perform validation, and handle setting up their own human-readable error messages.
Using the Built-in Validators
The built-in validators are powerful and easy to use. The official documentation shows each one and how to use it. For this example, I want to add the following validation to the password field:
- Make the field required.
- Require a minimum of 8 characters.
- Require at least one number.
- Require at least one special character.
In my sample register form, I could add four of the built-in validators to do this:
private createForm(): FormGroup {
const form = this.fb.group({
email: [''],
password: [
'',
[
Validators.required,
Validators.minLength(8),
Validators.pattern(/[-+_!@#$%^&*,.?]/),
Validators.pattern(/[0-9]/),
],
],
});
return form;
}
Then I would bind the error properties to the template, and write messages based on which errors are active:
<mat-form-field>
<input
name="password"
id="password"
type="password"
matInput
placeholder="Password"
formControlName="password"
required
/>
<mat-error *ngIf="form.get('password')?.errors">
<div *ngIf="form.get('password')?.errors?.required">
Password is required.
</div>
<div *ngIf="form.get('password')?.errors?.minlength">
Password must be at least 8 characters.
</div>
<div *ngIf="form.get('password')?.errors?.pattern?.requiredPattern === '/[-+_!@#$%^&*,.?]/'">
Password requires at least one special character.
</div>
<div *ngIf="form.get('password')?.errors?.pattern?.requiredPattern === '/[0-9]/'">
Password requires at least one number.
</div>
</mat-error>
</mat-form-field>
This works fine, and gives the user reactive feedback on if their password meets the requirements. There are two reasons that I prefer using custom validators, however. The first is that the built-in validators only handle the most common use cases. The second is that I like to consolidate where I create validation error messages. The built-in validators provide me the tools I need to write error messages, but the properties are not readable by regular users. So I need to write the messages by hand, it makes this code hard to reuse. It would be nice to have code where I can keep the responsibility of creating human-readable error messages, and handle any complex validation logic.
Creating a Custom PasswordValidator
Custom form validators are simply functions. I prefer to put them in classes, and I usually make them static because of how straightforward the logic is to write. Custom validators act on the passed in AbstractControl. This is where the I can evaluate whatever I want about the AbstractControl. Custom validators expect one of two values returned. null means that validation passed, and there are no errors. ValidationErrors is just a wrapping for a key value pair and is how I return error messages. These error messages can be static and hard coded, or dynamic. Below I show an example for some simple validation I could do for creating a new password:
export class PasswordValidator {
static validPassword(isRequired: boolean = false): ValidatorFn {
return (control: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null => {
if (!control.value) {
return isRequired ? { invalidPassword: `Password is required.` } : null;
}
if (control.value.length < 8) {
return { invalidPassword: `Password is too short.` };
}
if (!CONSTANTS.SYMBOL_REGEX.test(control.value)) {
return {
invalidPassword: `Password requires at least one special character.`,
};
}
if (!CONSTANTS.DIGIT_REGEX.test(control.value)) {
return {
invalidPassword: `Password requires at least one numeric character.`,
};
}
return null;
};
}
}
This custom password validator checks for the same four requirements that I listed separately with the built-in validators. If I know that I will want to always check for those four requirements, it is nice to have them collected in a single method.
I like putting a amount of logic to handle if the field is required or not here (as seen with if (!control.value)) so I don’t need to bind multiple validators to a single control, but that’s personal preference. I moved the regular expressions to a constants file and named them since I can find them hard to read. The default behavior is that form validators update whenever a user changes a value on the form. However, it is possible to do something like add a debounce to tweak how often it fires.
Using the Validator
Custom validators are easy to use. In the component where I set up my reactive form, I can use my custom validators at any level of the form. This means that I can apply the validator to a FormControl, a FormArray, or an entire FormGroup. In a future post I will show how to create a validator that can evaluate and compare multiple control values. Here though, I just need to pass the validator to the FormControl value I am creating. I am using FormBuilder in this example:
private createForm(): FormGroup {
const form = this.fb.group({
email: [''],
password: [
'',
Validators.compose([PasswordValidator.validPassword(true)]),
],
});
return form;
}
Since I made my method static, I invoke it as PasswordValidator.validPassword(true). If I had used a service, I would inject like this.passwordValidator.validPassword(true) instead. As I like to handle if it’s required or not with a single validator, I pass true to the method (again, this is just personal preference and not required when making a custom validator).
Now that I have moved the logic of figuring out what message to show to the user out of the template, I can simplify what is in the template a lot:
<mat-form-field>
<input
name="password"
id="password"
type="password"
matInput
placeholder="Password"
formControlName="password"
/>
<mat-error *ngIf="form.get('password')?.errors">
<ng-container *ngFor="let error of form.get('password')?.errors | keyvalue">
<div *ngIf="error.key !== 'required'">{{ error.value }}</div>
</ng-container>
</mat-error>
</mat-form-field>
I added the second check of error.key !== 'required' here to skip over the required error that Angular adds automatically when I add the required attribute to the input element. For non-example projects, I normally use a custom pipe to handle traversing the errors object rather than the keyvalue pipe here. I’ll explain that in more detail in a follow up article.
Testing the Validator
It is really easy to write unit tests for these kinds of validators. This way I can write custom logic and feel confident that it does what I expect and that I am handling edge cases. Below are some example test snippets, and the rest are here:
it(`should return null if value matches RegEx`, () => {
passwordControl.setValue('passwordTest1!');
expect(passwordValidator(passwordControl)).toEqual(null);
});
it(`should return { invalidPassword: 'Password is too short.' } when value is too short`, () => {
passwordControl.setValue('test');
const expectedValue = { invalidPassword: 'Password is too short.' };
expect(passwordValidator(passwordControl)).toEqual(expectedValue);
});
it(`should return { invalidPassword: 'Password requires at least one special character.' } when missing special characters`, () => {
passwordControl.setValue('passwordTest1');
const expectedValue = {
invalidPassword: 'Password requires at least one special character.',
};
expect(passwordValidator(passwordControl)).toEqual(expectedValue);
});
it(`should return { invalidPassword: 'Password requires at least one numeric character.' } when missing numeric characters`, () => {
passwordControl.setValue('passwordTest!');
const expectedValue = {
invalidPassword: 'Password requires at least one numeric character.',
};
expect(passwordValidator(passwordControl)).toEqual(expectedValue);
});
Between creating custom validators like this and then listening to the form state, developers can create reactive and engaging content for users.
Resources
The repository includes unit tests for the validator to help dial in the desired behavior. Here is the repository on GitHub, and here is a working demo of the code on StackBlitz. All of my posts on Angular are tagged and collected here.
The post Exploring Custom Form Validators In Angular appeared first on Hapax Legomenon.
Top comments (0)