When something breaks in production or a release behaves differently than expected, the question usually isn’t “what’s in this branch?” — it’s:
What actually changed between releases?
K-DIFF’s tag comparison is designed specifically for that moment.
Instead of scanning commit histories or manually comparing files, you can select two tags and generate a structured diff session that captures changes across the entire repository — code, files, and context.
That session can then be used to:
generate release notes
validate what actually shipped
audit unexpected changes
establish a clear baseline for regression analysis
By anchoring analysis to release tags rather than development branches, teams get a more accurate, version-aware view of change — which is often what matters most after deployment.
It’s a small shift in how diffs are used, but it makes release analysis far more concrete and less error-prone.
Top comments (0)