I broke our main API last week. I merged a PR of mine I had been working for a while. It got two approvals from two co-workers, green test suite and it was working perfectly fine locally and on our staging environment, the one that we test things before we send them to production. Somehow, the Node.js server failed to boot on production and we had to rollback to the last deployment, resulting into a 2-3 minutes downtime.
Well there were so much to learn from that adventure, but the one that we are going to focus on this post is, why did the Node.js server failed to boot on production while was working perfectly fine locally and on our pre-production staging environment? Keep reading.
What happened?
Wanna see the PR that brought our production down? Here it is:
I literally moved a dependency from the dependencies
section to devDependencies
. Reinstall my dependencies locally and rerun the server and was working perfectly. I then deployed to our staging and again, worked perfectly fine. But, failed to boot on production.
Specifically, the production server failed to boot cause it wasn't able to find the chance
module.
Yes! That's obscure! Well not so much. Let's take it from the beginning.
The Node.js server was mostly running in three different environments. It was using the NODE_ENV
to denote the current environment. It could take three different values based on where it was running, development
for when it was running locally, staging
for when it was running on our staging environment and production
for when it was running on our production environment.
Now here's an interesting piece from npm
docs:
With the --production flag (or when the NODE_ENV environment variable is set to production), npm will not install modules listed in devDependencies.
Yes! The NODE_ENV
will actually impact your production environment and will enlarge the gap between production and other environments. Let's revisit a famous quote from the The twelve-factor app:
Keep development, staging, and production as similar as possible.
Unfortunately, by setting our NODE_ENV
to a value based on the current environment it was running on, we were actually making our environments parity bigger.
The immediate action we took after that incident was simple. To decouple our application environment from NODE_ENV
. We introduced the APP_ENV
variable, renamed all NODE_ENV
occurrences to that and then moved NODE_ENV
to only have values development
when running locally or while running unit tests and production
for all other environments.
Another aspect of this is that some other library may be using this variable as well without even knowing about it. And it won't be looking for multiple values, it will only be looking for production
vs anything else.
Now where did NODE_ENV
came from and why does npm actually uses it? Node.js documentation mention nothing about such a variable. Well the NODE_ENV
variable became famous from the Express.js framework where it was using it to decide whether it should enable some development features on production. After people started to use it, other projects started to adopt it as well and we reached today.
To conclude
Like I mention above, we learned quite a few things from that incident, but our immediate action was to rename NODE_ENV
in an attempt to keep to our online environments as similar as possible. 🤓
Were there any actions or decisions you took recently to address this issue?
Top comments (0)