Introduction
Good news, everyone! 😉 We did it! Fiber version 1.8.43 scored awesome benchmark results! Now we hold a strong third place o...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Does Fiber achieve this performance with a single thread, like Express does? If not then Fibre is not qualified to be compared with Express yet.
Also you miss express from the test results entirely, which should not happen when you compare them.
@abdulmannan3 , both Fiber & Express used all cores in the benchmark, see source:
github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBe...
github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBe...
@Sirajul, you can filter the results by displaying Fiber & Express only:
techempower.com/benchmarks/#sectio...
I uploaded the comparison on our wiki: fiber.wiki/benchmarks
You can see on TechEmpower site all results, included Express: link was on top of article... but okay, I add some screenshots to article, no problem! 😉
What about the single thread part?
Please read Project Information Framework Tests Overview for more understand, how TechEmpower does its benchmarks for each web framework.
Seems like they used 14core(28threads) cpu to prove us that multithreading is the King ;)
We are seriously considering to switch from Java(spring cloud) to some go Framework. Would you compare it with Spring cloud? we are looking features like Service discovery, orchestration etc and support to gRPC(important).
Fiber does not have HTTP/2 support unless you use a reverse proxy like cloudflare, nginx, f5, incapsula etc. I don't have much experience with the Spring cloud framework, but I don't think making the switch is worth it if your application relies on gRPC. However, HTTP/2 is being worked on github.com/valyala/fasthttp/issues... and when this is ready, the gRPC protocol could follow!
Thank you. We are still running in Http 1.1 and not going to grpc for some time now.
However I'm looking for complete framework support for microservices architecture like service discovery, orchestration, tracing, health monitor as we are not using kubernate
I don't see express in any of the screenshots but only in the text. 🤔 Am I missing something or the images are not loading properly?
You can see all frameworks and results here, including Express. I will add some screenshots, might be more convenient! 😉
I was reading from mobile and the link just doesn't load properly in mobile, so I just got disappointed.
Thanks for sharing anyway. Appreciate it. Will take a look from desktop.
Op appears evasive on therding question. It is possible he did not thread node but did on Go Lang. Likely some sort of marketing.
How about you compare yourself to gin ? Doing a speed comparaison to a node framework is cheap. Any golang framework should beat any js framework unless the golang dev is particularly incompetent.
Hi Tomasz, as you can see in the benchmarks we do compare Fiber with all web frameworks in any language (including gin). Since Fiber is heavily based on the Express API, I think it does no harm to include the results. Regarding the overwhelming results, it has nothing to do with Express but rather with Nodejs.
You can filter specific frameworks in the benchmark results, here I only enabled Fiber & Gin here 👍
I'll take a look at it this weekend and do some more bench marking myself against gin.
On the other hands, gnet is very fast in plaintext, could be deserve attention for specific use case.
Here is another benchmark
github.com/the-benchmarker/web-fra...
fasthttp does really well while fiber is average
I might be the fiber implementation
Hi Joseph, we are aware of the results of those benchmarks. We had contact with the owner and he confirmed that those are invalid results and therefore it's not production-ready yet.
Rank 28 - 41 are all limited to the benchmarked machine, I suggest checking out a more stable benchmark project like TechEmpower techempower.com/benchmarks/#sectio...