The battleground of web development has long echoed with the clash of frameworks. For years, developers have navigated a dizzying array of HTML and...
Some comments have been hidden by the post's author - find out more
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Ah, 'tailwind'... or as some might misspell it, 'tailwhine.' Yes, it appears the developers have finally embraced the, shall we say, unique approach of injecting complexity directly into their markup. One might almost suspect they're more concerned with achieving a certain 'aesthetic of coolness' than, say, crafting functional and maintainable projects. But who am I to judge? After all, the end-user, bless their oblivious hearts, will remain blissfully unaware of the arcane incantations used to render their buttons. I, on the other hand, will continue my quaint, old-fashioned journey with basic, vanilla CSS. It's a matter of personal preference, of course. A truly fascinating initiative, regardless.
The cover image is funny 🤣🍻
You don't say that. Other people say that. You wrote the post.
I found other codepen examples here codepen.io/leo-bnu.
This is my codepen profile page 👍
Nice
Article is most likely AI generated. I was expecting clear examples of where the library shines, and maybe some interesting benchmark to back the claims.
I'd literally never heard of it unlike the other frameworks mentioned. A very bold statement, and one I'd expect from an LLM.
edit: oh right, and the author of this post is a maintainer on GitHub.
Maybe Im just not seeing it, and I need to keep learning. But how is 90k minified css file (over 100k for the scoped version) considered "lean" and "minimalist"? Dont get me wrong, I like it , but I wish I can easily load just the parts I need rather than the whole file with everything. Even when using the separated source CSS files, you still need to load half the library in a certain order sometimes, just to get to get the components you want to work correctly. I understand that's the price we pay sometimes for extreme modularity and shared classes.
Id love to have the options to not have to load the material icon pack (FontAwesome icons don't always work right in the Beer CSS system, and the only alternative is to use Material. I think it was related to using SVG icons but cant recall at the moment).
Apologize if it sounds like I'm venting. Lol.
Here is what I would love to have with my beer:
1) Sass support to make it easier to import and create just the components I need and use
2) More default themes to choose from
3) Smaller bundles. Maybe a lighter version without need for shapes or fonts.
Beer CSS is a lightweight framework that focuses on minimalism, semantic HTML, and performance, offering essential styling without unnecessary bloat. It strikes the perfect balance between ease of use and flexibility, making it ideal for both rapid prototyping and full-scale projects.
Do you know your credit score can affect your insurance rates? Insurance companies think your credit score reflects the risks involved in ensuring you. For me this is very important because insurance is expensive and with a bad credit score could increase my insurance premiums dramatically. So I'm always lucky to use the service of this tech guru at 'HACKSPEED24 @ GMAIL COM, He removes late payments or any stuff you wish to remove from your credit report and boost your score to about 785 – 790, for an affordable price, his service is legit and reliable..
I really wish I could see what all these deleted comments say. Maybe they say something about how the author of this post is behind beer css and that the rest of the comments are pretty clearly sock puppets. I wonder if people who delete dev.to comments, comment on their own posts, and pimp their own packages in disingenuous 'hey guys look at this cool package I just found' ways also buy GitHub stars? Idk man I'm just asking questions. This will probably be deleted.
Why is the text written by Ai?