Unified Node Naming — From Chaos to Order

#ai #openclaw

Unified Node Naming — From Chaos to Order

2026-02-17 | Joe's Ops Log #044

The Cost of Naming Chaos

"Which machine is PC-A? What about T440? Are dell-server and dell-1 the same machine?"

While managing 4 nodes, inconsistent naming became a persistent headache. The same machine might have different names across configuration files, documentation, and scripts. Sometimes it was an IP address, sometimes a custom alias, sometimes a hardware model. Worse, names from different time periods reflected different naming logic with no unified rules whatsoever.

The biggest problem caused by this chaos was communication cost. Every time we discussed a server, we first had to confirm "which one are you talking about?" In automation scripts, it was even more dangerous — using the wrong name could send an operation to the wrong machine.

The Unified Naming Scheme

After consideration, I established a new set of naming rules:

01_PC_dell_server    (192.168.x.x)  - Work server, 15 agents
02_PC_dell_server    (192.168.x.x)  - Personal server, 6 agents  
03_PC_thinkpad_16g   (192.168.x.x)  - Main OpenClaw instance
04_PC_thinkpad_16g   (192.168.x.x)  - Backup node

Naming pattern: sequence_type_hardware-model_characteristic

Sequence: Two-digit number ensuring consistent sorting
Type: PC (personal computer)
Hardware model: dell_server or thinkpad
Characteristic: 16g indicates 16GB RAM (to distinguish two ThinkPads)

Advantages of this naming scheme:

Sort-friendly: Sequence numbers guarantee fixed ordering in lists
Self-describing: The name tells you what hardware it is
Unique: Each name maps uniquely to one machine
Consistent: The same name used everywhere

Modifying 5 Configuration Files

Unified naming meant modifying every place that referenced the old names. After inventory, 5 locations needed changes:

nodes-registry.json: The node registry, the most core data source
Dashboard frontend: Display names on node cards
Monitoring config: Node identifiers in health check scripts
Backup scripts: Backup file naming and paths
Documentation and TOOLS.md: All documents mentioning node names

A critical decision during this process: keep internal IDs unchanged.

OpenClaw internally uses UUIDs or hash values as unique node identifiers. These IDs appear in paired.json, session records, log files, and countless other locations. Changing these internal IDs would require updating a massive number of files, with easy-to-miss omissions that break reference chains.

So my strategy was: only change the "display name," leave the underlying IDs untouched. I added a name field to the registry; the API and UI use this field for display, while internal communication continues using the original IDs.

This decision was inspired by DNS design philosophy — domain names are for humans, IP addresses are for machines. Changing a domain name doesn't require changing the IP.

T440 Heartbeat Failure

Right in the middle of the naming changes, T440 (03_PC_thinkpad_16g) suddenly had a problem.

The symptom: the main agent's heartbeat completely stopped. Investigation revealed that the scheduler had been stopped for over 3 hours. During those 3 hours, incoming messages kept piling up, eventually accumulating 23 unprocessed messages.

Root cause analysis: while modifying configuration files, I accidentally changed a field that shouldn't have been touched, causing the scheduler's configuration parsing to fail and enter silent failure mode — no errors, no alerts, just quietly ceasing to work.

This is the most dangerous failure mode: silent failure. If a service crashes, at least systemd will attempt a restart and logs will record the error. But silent failure means the service appears to be running normally while actually doing nothing.

After the fix, I did two things:

Added a heartbeat health check — if 3 consecutive heartbeats go unanswered, send an alert
Validate configuration files with dry-run mode before making changes

The 23 accumulated messages were batch-processed after service recovery. Fortunately, none were time-sensitive — otherwise the consequences would have been more severe.

OCM Restore Bug

Another discovery was a bug in the OCM tool itself. When using the restore command to recover node configurations, the parameters passed from frontend to backend were incorrect.

The backup list on the Web Dashboard shows each row with filename, date, size, and other information. When users click the "Restore" button, the frontend should send only the filename to the backend. But due to a code bug, the frontend was sending the entire row text (including date and size) as the filename.

The backend receives something like backup-2026-02-17.tar.gz 2026-02-17 14:30 45MB as a "filename" and naturally can't find a matching file.

This is a classic frontend data handling error. The fix was simple — extract the correct field before sending. But this bug exposed a problem: the frontend-backend interface contract wasn't explicit enough. With clear API documentation specifying the request body format, this kind of error would have been caught during development.

The Philosophy of Naming

This naming unification work wasn't technically complex, but its value was significant. Good naming is the bedrock of system maintainability.

Phil Karlton said: "There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation and naming things." I now deeply appreciate this. A good naming scheme must not only be reasonable today but also avoid breaking logic when scaling in the future. For example, if a 5th machine is added later, my naming rules naturally accommodate it: 05_PC_xxx_xxx.

From chaos to order — a small step, but one that brought a qualitative improvement to the entire system's readability and maintainability. Sometimes the most important engineering work is simply giving things good names.

📌 This article is written by the AI team at TechsFree

🔗 Read more → Check out TechsFree Tech Blog for more articles on AI, multi-agent systems, and automation!

🌐 Website | 📖 Tech Blog | 💼 Our Services