If you are new to microservices, you’ve probably heard of the Saga Pattern – a design pattern for managing distributed transactions in microservices. It helps services coordinate smoothly, maintain data consistency, and achieve eventual consistency even when a service fails. This article will help you quickly understand the Saga Pattern, with clear examples and fundamental technical concepts.
1. Context and Problem
In traditional (monolithic) systems, you can use a transaction to ensure data consistency:
- If all steps succeed → commit
- If any step fails → rollback
Example of order processing in a monolithic system:
- Deduct customer payment
- Deduct product inventory
- Send confirmation email
All steps are in one transaction, so if any step fails → rollback everything, keeping the data consistent.
However, in microservices, each step is usually managed by a separate service with its own database:
- Payment Service: deduct money
- Inventory Service: deduct stock
- Notification Service: send email
If a step fails, previous steps may have already committed, leading to data inconsistency.
Example: the customer is charged, but the product is out of stock, or the confirmation email was not sent.
This is the problem the Saga Pattern solves: helping services in microservices coordinate smoothly and keep data consistent even in case of failures.
2. What is the Saga Pattern?
The Saga Pattern is a design pattern for managing distributed transactions in microservices.
Instead of using a traditional transaction (rollback everything if one step fails), each service manages its own transaction, and if a subsequent step fails, the system performs compensation for previous steps.
Example of an online order:
- Payment Service: deducts money → success
- Inventory Service: deducts stock → fails (out of stock)
- Notification Service: sends email → not executed
- Without Saga Pattern: Payment Service already charged the customer → the customer loses money but gets no product
- With Saga Pattern: Inventory Service fails → Payment Service refunds, email not sent → avoids confusion
Core idea: Each step takes responsibility and has a compensation mechanism, allowing steps in a distributed transaction to coordinate without breaking the system.
3. Two Approaches to Implement Saga Pattern
3.1 Event-Driven Saga
- Each step emits an event on success or failure
- The next step listens to events to decide whether to execute or compensate
Example:
- Payment Service deducts money → emits event
"PaymentSuccess" - Inventory Service listens → deducts stock
- If Inventory Service fails → emits event
"InventoryFailed" - Payment Service listens → performs refund
Advantages:
- No central orchestrator needed; services coordinate flexibly on their own
- Easy to scale when adding new services
Disadvantages:
- Hard to track the overall transaction state
- Susceptible to duplicate or delayed events, requiring idempotency
3.2 Orchestration Saga
- A central orchestrator coordinates all steps
- If a step fails, the orchestrator commands rollback of previous steps
Example:
- Orchestrator commands Payment Service → success
- Orchestrator commands Inventory Service → fails
- Orchestrator commands Payment Service refund
- Notification Service does not send email
Advantages:
- Easy to manage complex processes, centralized state control
- Easier to track and reduce risk of duplicate or missing events
Disadvantages:
- Orchestrator becomes a single point of failure; if it fails or lags → affects the entire transaction
- Adds a central component → increases deployment complexity
4. Illustrative Example: Online Order
Assume a 3-step order process:
- Payment Service: deduct customer money → success
- Inventory Service: deduct stock → fails (out of stock)
- Notification Service: send email → not executed
Without Saga Pattern:
- Payment Service already charged → customer loses money but gets no product
- Inventory Service fails → data inconsistency
With Saga Pattern (Event-Driven or Orchestration):
- Inventory Service fails → Payment Service refunds
- Email not sent → avoids confusion
- Process remains consistent, ensuring good customer experience
Saga Pattern allows each step in a distributed transaction to be independent while still coordinating effectively, ensuring data consistency and good user experience.
5. Key Technical Terms
Transaction: A sequence of operations on data that ensures ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability).
Example: Transferring money from account A to B; if deducting A succeeds but adding B fails → rollback.Distributed Transaction: A transaction spanning multiple services or separate databases, requiring compensation or eventual consistency.
Example: Online order: Payment Service deducts money, Inventory Service deducts stock, Notification Service sends email.Saga Pattern: Design pattern managing distributed transactions by performing compensation if a subsequent step fails.
Example: Inventory Service reports out of stock → Payment Service refunds.Compensation: Undo a committed step if another step fails.
Example: Payment Service deducted money but Inventory Service fails → Payment Service refunds.Event: Asynchronous message between services indicating transaction status.
Example: Payment Service sends"PaymentSuccess", Inventory Service listens and deducts stock.Orchestrator: Central component in Orchestration Saga coordinating steps and rollbacks.
Example: Orchestrator commands Payment → Inventory → rollback if necessary.Partial Failure: One step in a distributed transaction fails while others have committed.
Example: Payment Service succeeds, but Inventory Service reports out of stock.Consistency: Data always satisfies business rules after a transaction.
Example: After ordering, total money deducted = total order price, stock decreases correctly.Eventual Consistency: The system will become consistent over time, not immediately.
Example: Payment Service commits first, Inventory Service commits later, overall state eventually correct.Idempotency: Performing an operation multiple times does not corrupt data, preventing duplicate events.
Example:"PaymentSuccess"event sent twice → Payment Service only deducts once.Orchestration Saga: Saga Pattern implemented with a central orchestrator coordinating steps.
Example: Orchestrator commands Payment → Inventory → Notification; rollback if Inventory fails.Event-Driven Saga: Saga Pattern implemented with each service managing its own transaction, emitting/listening to events without a central coordinator.
Example: Payment sends"PaymentSuccess"→ Inventory deducts stock → Inventory sends"InventoryFailed"→ Payment refunds.
6. Conclusion
The Saga Pattern is a design pattern for managing distributed transactions in microservices, helping:
- Each service manages its own transaction and can perform compensation in case of failure
- Services remain independent but coordinated, ensuring overall process stability
- Reduces risks: data consistency, good user experience, continuous operation
Saga Pattern is an essential design pattern that makes complex systems efficient, reliable, and easier to manage.
Top comments (0)