Last december I've started my first "real job" and, apart from the great onboarding experience, I've been having a bit of trouble setting up my ben...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Disclaimer: I know all about browsers lack of support and, most importantly, old phones performing really bad on webpages, but I wouldn't want to discuss every liability of web technologies. These are edge cases, IMO.
I think this post's should be summed up as: if it's not a cool game or something to tweak the phone's system, please don't ship a mobile app nowadays.
Are you talking about enterprise apps or in general?
About what part?
I think I talk about apps in general in this disclaimer. Like one comment below, it wouldn't be a practical solution to ship WhatsApp solely as a web app, since important features would be missing in old phones.
I totally agree with you. In fact, on friday I was doing a little talk in an online marketing course telling the enormous benefits of developing one web application and using current technologies to create PWA or even hybrid apps (ionic, react, vaadin or electron) from that web application.
As a piece of information, I will leave you this link to a web that gathers PWA experiences from the development point of view and its impact in the economical aspects of the application development.
pwastats.com
Greetings,
Mario
Thank you very much, Mario!
I will save it for checking it ;)
One clumsy part with PWAs is telling people to install it.
With a native app on the app store: "Go to Google Play and search app name and download it"
With a PWA: "go to appname.com and then look for the add to home screen button hidden somewhere in your browser"
You don't have to install the app to homescreen for PWA benefits
Service worker, notification, responsive design all works without add to homescreen.
Your pre-conceived notion is that people know how to navigate websites etc. I agree with every point you made but I've been in this field now for over 15 years. The main issue is users in the 36-60+ demographic simply don't like going to websites. It's like pulling teeth telling someone to type something in a URL bar I guess.
I use dev.to installed too, awesome work :)
Ok, how about teaching us how to make a PWA WhatsApp clone xd.
As a matter of fact, Whatsapp wouldn't be the hardest app to replicate if supporting low-level (and iPhones hihi) phones wasn't a goal.
I think the most advanced use cases for Whatsapp are notifications and registering itself as a share app, both supported by PWA tecnologies.
I get your point, but my title and the comment disclaimer both make it clear that web apps aren't a silver bullet now. I hope it becomes one someday, but it might not, and there's no problem with that.
No i asked you to do it because i want to make such an app :p this has dms right? Can we have a talk :0
WhatsApp is a native app because they don't want to store your data, they can't afford it.
But for a PWA people expect them to work all across their devices not like "No it's an Android app, you can't run it on your PC or IOS device"
Too bad Apple is intentionally dragging their feet on support lest your idea catch on and cut into their sweet sweet app store / apple developer revenue.
Truly agree with you Lucis. Companies are just following the pattern to make native web apps (although needed or not) PWA technology is meant for mobile users.