DEV Community

Cover image for Suffering from BUGS: How I Almost Deleted My Entire Project

Suffering from BUGS: How I Almost Deleted My Entire Project

Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour on February 19, 2026

You know that iconic DJ Khaled album, "Suffering from Success"? The one where he looks overwhelmed by how much he's winning? Yeah... I WISH that...
Collapse
 
harsh2644 profile image
Harsh

We've all been there! Mine was a 'rm -rf' near-death experience. The panic is real. Glad you made it through! Would love to know β€” did you have backups? And what's your backup strategy now after this near-miss?

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

The panic is very real Harsh. Yeah I always do have backups, I usually have a stable version as a private repository on my GitHub, and then the main one, and also another one where I play around with. So when i was able to make the main one work and I started having the issues with the backend, I just experimented on the other two backups till it clicked, then I updated the main one. That’s usually how I go about things, because anything can happenπŸ˜‚

Collapse
 
harsh2644 profile image
Harsh

Haha, that actually sounds like a solid system. Having multiple backups definitely saves you when things go sideways. Glad it worked out in the end πŸ˜„

Thread Thread
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

Yeah a 100%

Collapse
 
dannwaneri profile image
Daniel Nwaneri

This hit close to home.

Been building The Foundation - a federated AI knowledge commons on Cloudflare Workers. ActivityPub federation, semantic search, browser extension, the works. spent days fighting content-type headers that mastodon kept rejecting, wrangler deploys that succeeded but broke things silently, schema migrations that worked locally but not remote.

But the one that broke me was trying to capture claude chats. first attempt was ctrl+a, ctrl+c - paste the whole thing. didn't capture code blocks properly. then tried scraping the DOM. then share links. each one worked until it didn't. share links stripped artifacts. DOM scraping broke on long conversations. ended up building a full browser extension just to capture conversations reliably

at some point i wrote a whole "scaling back" post because the scope had outgrown what one person with client work and a life could maintain.

your line "this IS the job" is exactly it. fixing the requirements.txt isn't a distraction from real work. it IS the real work. switching from gemini to groq wasn't giving up - it was architecture thinking

you learned through the pain. that's the part no tutorial teaches

keep building πŸ™

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

Exactly so Daniel, thanks for the read!

Collapse
 
pauetisdev profile image
Pau Vilardell LladΓ³

Man, I felt that 'disc error' analogy in my soul. πŸ˜‚ We’ve all been there: the 45-second spinner that feels like a lifetime when you’re trying to impress a user (or a recruiter).

Moving from Gemini Pro to Groq/Llama-3 for speed is a classic 'Architect vs Coder' moveβ€”choosing UX over 'model prestige'. I’ve had similar nightmares deploying fiscal tools for freelancers where a 10-second delay meant people thought their taxes were being calculated wrong.

Great pivot! If you ever decide to document that 'SlideSift' architecture further, let me know. I'm currently sharing similar 'build-in-public' struggles and freelance tips over at devfreelance.es . Don’t delete the repo, the 'war stories' are what make us senior devs!

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour • Edited

Honestly mine was spinning for like 1:30secsπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚that spinner alone would make you lose hope in life itself. That’s amazing, will give a follow and let you know whenever I document on it further Pau!

Collapse
 
pauetisdev profile image
Pau Vilardell LladΓ³

🀣🀣🀣thanks!!

Collapse
 
pascal_cescato_692b7a8a20 profile image
Pascal CESCATO

I could totally relate to your post! Honestly, who hasn't had an experience like yours? But looking back, it's the experiences that make us feel most desperate that also teach us the most...

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

Rightly said Pascal :)

Collapse
 
nightfury_e56b11bd7fb0e46 profile image
Nightfury

I suggest self-host method that uses your own VPS.
If you are developer, you will use vps even though it's cheap or not.
If use self VPS, it's no problem to deploy, control your project at any time.
You should know about setting nginx, certbot, domain services before host.

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

I totally see the value in self-hosting on a VPS for the control and long-term cost benefits. However, as a student with a pretty packed schedule and a few other projects , I think diving into Nginx, Certbot, and server maintenance right now might be a bit overwhelming.

I’m currently focusing my energy on the core logic and 'bug-proofing' the application itself. I’d love to transition to a VPS setup once the project is more stable, but for now, I need to keep the infrastructure simple so I can actually keep up with the build without burning out! Thanks for the tip, though, definitely something for the roadmap.

Collapse
 
nightfury_e56b11bd7fb0e46 profile image
Nightfury

There are only some CLIs to install nginx hosting environment.

Thread Thread
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

I totally get the benefits of a VPS for control, but honestly, between my school work and actually building projects, I unfortunately don't have the luxury of time to be a full-time developer and a sysadmin at the same timeπŸ˜…πŸ˜…. Trying to keep it simple for now so I can stay focused on the logic without burning out. But thanks a lot for the advice Nightfury :)

Collapse
 
matthewhou profile image
Matthew Hou

The moment you described almost nuking the project β€” I felt that.

The thing that saved me in a similar situation: git stash when you're spiraling. Sometimes you need to physically see the clean state of the codebase to stop catastrophizing. The bug is never as bad from a fresh checkout as it is after 3 hours of debugging.

Also: rubber duck debugging is underrated. I've lost count of how many times I've started typing a Stack Overflow question, written out the full context, and then immediately seen the bug before hitting submit. The act of explaining forces clarity.

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

Totally right Matthew! I think with debugging in general, you do need a lot of patience. And sometimes that patience is lost when you’re frustrated 😭 but you’re right πŸ’―

Collapse
 
bhavin-allinonetools profile image
Bhavin Sheth

This hit too close πŸ˜… I’ve faced the same β€œworks on localhost, breaks in production” nightmare. Locking dependency versions and testing in a production-like environment early saved me later. Also +1 on choosing speed over the β€œsmartest” model β€” users forgive slightly less accuracy, but they never forgive waiting.

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

Exactly no one has patience these days (incl myself) so speed always wins

Collapse
 
theminimalcreator profile image
Guilherme Zaia

Groq was the right call. Gemini Pro's latency isn't a code bugβ€”it's architecture mismatch. For summarization, inference speed beats model complexity every time. But here's the gap: switching models reactive fixes symptoms. The real fix? Design for latency upfront. Circuit Breaker pattern + fallback caching would've saved 48hrs of deploy hell. Your requirements.txt failure is textbook: unpinned deps = production roulette. pip freeze locks versions, but Docker + multi-stage builds guarantee parity between local/cloud. You learned the hard way what enterprise systems architect for day one: robustness > feature hype.

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

I definitely learnt more about architecture doing this project! Thanks for the feedback :)

Collapse
 
maxxmini profile image
MaxxMini

The requirements.txt versioning issue is so real. I had almost the exact same experience deploying a Gemini-based tool β€” worked perfectly locally, then the cloud server pulled an older google-generativeai version that didn't support the model I was using. What saved me was pinning exact versions with pip freeze > requirements.txt instead of manually writing them. Also, for the 45-second cold start on Render's free tier β€” if you end up needing something snappier, Vercel's serverless functions with Python runtime might be worth a look. The cold starts are usually under 5 seconds.

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

Glad we can trauma bond on the same issues haha. And for the Vercel serverless functions I’ll try that and see how it goes, thanks for that tip Maxx

Collapse
 
qwandery profile image
Brian Lacy

"I built a loading screen simulator."

I've built so many of these. 😁 I feel your pain.

On the LLM -- it does take time for most decent generative AI systems. But a lot of times there is an option to stream the results, which can allow you to provide a better experience for users. That's why Gemini or ChatGPT don't feel slow on the web; you get a continuous stream of data back starting immediately, so even though it takes 45 seconds to get the full result, you didn't have to sit there and wait 45 seconds for an answer. Something to look into.

Your project sounds cool, best of luck!

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

Thank you Brian!

Collapse
 
jpbroeders profile image
JP

Been there! The "delete it all and start over" feeling is real when bugs pile up. A few strategies that helped me avoid that spiral:

Prevention:

  • Static analysis early - Tools like ESLint, Ruff (Python), or SonarQube catch stupid bugs before they become disasters
  • Pre-commit hooks - Run linters and basic tests before code even hits your repo
  • Small PRs - Big feature branches = bug breeding grounds. Ship small, ship often

When bugs pile up:

  • Triage ruthlessly - Critical (blocks users), High (breaks features), Low (cosmetic). Fix critical first, defer low
  • Rubber duck it - Explain the bug out loud (or in writing). 80% of the time you'll spot the issue mid-explanation
  • Take a break - Seriously. A 20-minute walk solves more bugs than another hour of staring at code

Long-term:

  • Test the painful parts - You don't need 100% coverage, but the gnarly business logic? Test that thoroughly
  • Automate your QA - Playwright, Cypress, whatever. Catching regressions automatically > manual testing every time

The fact that you didn't delete it means you've got grit. That matters more than perfect code. Keep pushing!

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

Great advise there JP! I think what I didn’t do was taking a break, I was so pumped on caffeine and stress and didn’t even think about taking a break to refresh my brainπŸ˜…

Collapse
 
Sloan, the sloth mascot
Comment deleted
Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

Thanks for the advice Matthew! :)

Collapse
 
almadar profile image
Osama Alghanmi

Loved this article! Thanks for the laughs today. That first part about DJ Khaled absolutely killed me πŸ˜‚. I've been coding for 15 years, and it's hilarious how some of these experiences just never change. It has nothing to do with your level of experience.

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚glad I was able to make you laugh

Collapse
 
nomad4tech profile image
nomad4tech

There are also projects where you spend hours - sometimes even days - debugging and researching, and in the end it turns out to be such a stupid mistake or an absurdly simple solution that it’s almost funny. And you don’t even know how to track that kind of thing afterward

The upside, though, is that during all that suffering you actually learn a lot. You end up digging into areas you would never normally touch. You think about things and explore topics that wouldn’t even cross your mind under easier circumstances.

So yeah…what doesn’t kill us makes us stronger - even if your eye starts twitching afterward

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

My eyes were definitely twitching for sureπŸ˜‚ from the excessive caffeine intake. But you have worded it right, what doesn't kill us definitely makes us stronger & I have learnt a lot from the struggle.

Collapse
 
nivcmo profile image
nivcmo

This resonates so hard. The "works on localhost" to "500 Internal Server Error" pipeline is a rite of passage every developer goes through.

The real lesson you learned here isn't technical β€” it's psychological. That moment when you realize "this IS the job" is when you level up from coder to engineer. Anyone can write code that works in perfect conditions. Shipping it despite the chaos is the actual skill.

Also, respect for the Groq pivot. Knowing when to switch tools vs. forcing a solution is underrated wisdom. Sometimes the smartest move is admitting your first architecture choice was wrong and fixing it fast.

Keep building β€” these war stories are what make you dangerous in a few years.

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

ExactlyπŸ’―

Collapse
 
marina_zen_e2150dbea662ac profile image
Marina Zen

good

Collapse
 
intelligenttools_tomic_85 profile image
IntelligentTools

To avoid the "Works on My Machine" trap, you can use Docker. I use it for everything. It gives us portability, a stable environment for every project, literal separation of concerns for your runtime.

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

I will eventually use Docker, still learning and getting into devOps and infrastructure. So I mostly base my projects on stuff I am learning in real time πŸ˜… but will definitely use Docker when it gets to that time. I will keep that in mind, thanks for the advice! :)

Collapse
 
likhit profile image
Likhit Kumar V P

I felt the pain of those 500 errors in my soul. πŸ˜‚ Seriously, though, awesome job pushing through the 'it works on my machine' phase. The speed difference with Groq is a game changer definitely useful!

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚I know right?! That’s the worst kind of pain. Thank you Likhit :)

Collapse
 
vinay_sharma_e6ec1235f476 profile image
Vinay K Sharma

This is come back from set up .. kudos

Collapse
 
javz profile image
Julien Avezou

Nice project. This is a great example of how building real projects exposes you to real problems that require debugging. This is the best way to learn. And I also love dried mango slices by the way!

Collapse
 
maame-codes profile image
Maame Afua A. P. Fordjour

Thanks Julien! And yes!! Dried mango slices are the bestt

Collapse
 
sam_jha_054aa0cbf7a190601 profile image
sam jha

This is such a relatable story β€” the fear of the project imploding just from a cascading bug chain is real. What I found interesting is how you described the debugging process mentally: sometimes the bug isn't in the code you're looking at, it's in the assumption you made 200 lines earlier.

I've been building a Python CLI tool recently (file system automation), and the hardest bugs were always the silent ones β€” wrong rename logic that looked right until you actually ran it on real files. Dry-run mode saved me so many times.

Thanks for sharing this honestly β€” these posts are way more valuable than the "I built X in 2 hours" ones!