DEV Community

Mason K
Mason K

Posted on

I Outgrew Vimeo. Here Are 5 Other Tools I Wish I Knew Earlier

Vimeo was fine, until I actually had to build with video.
At first, I just needed to embed a few videos. Maybe a product walkthrough. Maybe a simple demo. Vimeo felt perfect: clean player, no ads, no nonsense. Copy, paste, done.

But then came the real stuff:
User uploads.
Custom playback logic.
Live streaming with automatic recording.
Analytics that actually helped me debug issues.

And that’s when Vimeo quietly fell apart.
It’s built for hosting, not building. Which is fine, until your product needs more than just a video box on a landing page.

So I started looking for alternatives. Not YouTube-style platforms, but actual tools developers could build on top of. Here are the five that stuck with me,  and which one I ended up using.
 

1. FastPix

The difference with FastPix was immediate. It didn’t ask me to design my app around its limitations. It gave me APIs and SDKs and let me build what I needed.
I started by testing their live streaming flow. In under an hour, I had:

  • Created a stream via API
  • Got an ingest URL and HLS playback URL
  • Went live with OBS
  • Stopped the stream, and boom, an on-demand version showed up automatically

No dashboards to babysit. No manual recording setup. Just infrastructure that worked the way I expected.
And the kicker? I could query real-time playback stats: startup delay, buffering events, resolution switches, actual session-level data, not just “X people watched this.”

FastPix also handled:

  • Uploads with resumable support
  • Transcoding to adaptive HLS
  • Role-based access + signed URLs
  • AI tagging (NSFW filtering, video chapters, object detection)
  • SDKs in Node, Python, Android, iOS, and React

It felt like using Stripe or Twilio, just for video.
If you’re building a streaming platform, fitness app, or anything video-native, FastPix gives you the kind of control Vimeo just doesn’t offer.
 

2. Kaltura

Kaltura came up when I was helping a university client revamp their internal LMS. It’s not a SaaS tool. It’s a platform and sometimes a beast of one.
But for enterprises or educational orgs that need:

  • SSO
  • LMS integration
  • Role-based access controls
  • Self-hosting
  • Compliance and DRM …it’s solid. Very solid.

The open-source angle is great if you want to own the whole stack. But expect a steep learning curve and real DevOps overhead. For small teams or fast-moving startups? Probably overkill.
 

3. Dacast

I used Dacast for a weekend event where the client needed live streaming + pay-per-view access. Honestly? It was dead simple.
I didn’t build a custom app. I just configured the stream in their dashboard, enabled paywalls, and shared the link.
No real developer tools. No API gymnastics. But for folks running religious streams, webinars, or sports broadcasts with basic monetization, it’s a good fit.

It’s not a platform you build on top of. It’s more like a box you drop your video into, and it does what it says.
 

4. JW Player

JW Player is fast. Like, really fast. I helped integrate it for a blog-style news site, and their load times dropped dramatically.

Ad support is top-notch , VAST, SSAI, pre-roll/mid-roll magic all there. If you care about ad fill and page performance, JW nails it.
But it’s not developer-friendly in the “build your own workflow” sense. You’re mostly tweaking the player layer. Uploading, analytics, AI stuff,  that all lives somewhere else.

It’s great for media companies. Not so great for apps trying to build unique video experiences.
 

5. Brightcove

Brightcove is polished, powerful, and... huge.
It handles OTT delivery, global content distribution, ad insertion, and all the stuff a giant broadcaster would need. I’ve never used it personally, but I’ve worked with clients who have,  and they all say the same thing:
“It works, but you need a team just to manage the vendor relationship.”

It’s enterprise video through and through. Lots of knobs, lots of features, lots of cost. You won’t see pricing on the website. You will see an enterprise contract with bundled features you may or may not need.

If you’re CNN or HBO, it’s worth a look. If you’re shipping fast and want engineering velocity? Probably not the move.
 

So, What Did I Choose?

I went with FastPix, because I wasn’t looking for another video host. I was building a product, and I needed infrastructure I could work with, not around.

The API gave me upload, transform, playback, analytics, and even AI feature,  all in one place. I didn’t have to wire together three vendors just to get a live stream online.
I didn’t want a marketing platform. I wanted something I could ship real features with.
 

Top comments (0)