This guide focuses on leveraging OPA Gatekeeper to strengthen security and maintain compliance within Kubernetes environments. Open Policy Agent (OPA), along with its Kubernetes-focused implementation, Gatekeeper, provides a policy-as-code framework that simplifies enforcing security and compliance rules. In this article, we’ll explain what OPA and Gatekeeper are, how they integrate into your Kubernetes setup, and practical ways to use them to uphold your organization’s security standards. By following this guide, you’ll learn how to make your Kubernetes clusters more resilient and reduce the risk of misconfigurations.
What is Open Policy Agent (OPA)?
Open Policy Agent (OPA) is an open-source, general-purpose policy engine that allows you to define and enforce policies as code across your entire infrastructure. By writing rules once, you can consistently apply them across microservices, APIs, CI/CD pipelines, and Kubernetes clusters.
OPA relies on Rego, a purpose-built language for querying and manipulating structured data, such as JSON. For instance, you could configure OPA to block container images that don’t originate from approved registries. This model separates policy decisions from your application logic—services request decisions from OPA instead of embedding hardcoded rules themselves.
Adopting a policy-as-code approach brings several advantages: policies can be version-controlled, tested, and reused across environments, resulting in a more consistent and manageable security posture. OPA provides APIs via HTTP or library calls, serving as a central authority to answer questions like, “Is this action allowed?” or “Does this configuration meet our policies?”
For a deeper dive into OPA and Rego, including hands-on examples, check out our dedicated tutorial.
How OPA Strengthens Kubernetes Security
In Kubernetes, admission controllers act as the first line of defense, intercepting API server requests before objects are saved. By deploying OPA as a dynamic admission controller, you can enforce custom policies on your Kubernetes resources with precision.
OPA extends Kubernetes’ native validations, offering fine-grained control over your environment. For example, it can require specific labels for auditing, enforce resource limits, or ensure that only container images from approved sources are used.
Every incoming object is evaluated against your organizational policies. Configurations that don’t comply—such as Pods missing required securityContext settings—are rejected with clear, actionable messages, preventing misconfigurations from taking effect.
OPA also continuously audits existing resources, identifying any drift from desired states. This combination of real-time enforcement and ongoing auditing provides a robust framework for defining and maintaining governance across your Kubernetes clusters.
What is OPA Gatekeeper?
OPA Gatekeeper is a Kubernetes-specific implementation of Open Policy Agent, developed through a collaboration between Google, Microsoft, Red Hat, and Styra. It’s designed to simplify policy enforcement in Kubernetes by providing native integration with the platform. Gatekeeper extends the Kubernetes API with Custom Resource Definitions (CRDs), enabling policies to be managed as Kubernetes objects. Implemented as a webhook, Gatekeeper can both validate incoming requests and mutate them before they’re accepted.
Gatekeeper brings several Kubernetes-native enhancements to OPA:
- ConstraintTemplates and Constraints: These CRDs allow policies to be declared as Kubernetes objects instead of raw configuration files, letting you manage policies using standard kubectl commands.
- Parameterization and Reusability: ConstraintTemplates act as reusable policy blueprints, while Constraints are parameterized instances, enabling scalable, flexible policy libraries.
- Audit Functionality: Gatekeeper continuously audits existing resources against enforced policies, detecting violations in resources created prior to policy adoption.
- Native Integration: By registering as a ValidatingAdmissionWebhook and MutatingAdmissionWebhook, Gatekeeper ensures real-time enforcement of policies across the cluster.
Essentially, Gatekeeper transforms OPA into a Kubernetes-native admission controller using a “configure, not code*”* approach. Instead of building custom webhooks from scratch, you define Rego policies and JSON configurations, while Gatekeeper handles the integration with Kubernetes’ admission flow.
Working Within the Kubernetes Control Plane
Gatekeeper integrates with Kubernetes as a validating admission webhook within the API server’s admission control pipeline. In practical terms, this means that when requests to create or modify resources are made, the API Server first authenticates and authorizes them, then passes them through admission controllers like Gatekeeper before persisting any changes.
Here’s how the process works: Gatekeeper registers a webhook with the API Server to intercept admission events—such as Pod creation or Deployment updates. The API Server pauses the request and wraps the resource in an AdmissionReview object, which it sends to Gatekeeper/OPA for evaluation. Using OPA, Gatekeeper checks the resource against active policies (Constraints). Non-compliant requests are rejected with clear messages explaining the violation, while compliant requests are allowed to proceed.
A look at K8s Admissions Control Phases
Gatekeeper’s webhook converts Kubernetes AdmissionReview requests into OPA’s input format. This JSON structure includes the object data, operation type (CREATE/UPDATE), and user information. OPA then evaluates the policies and outputs any violations, which Gatekeeper translates back into admission responses.
Beyond real-time enforcement, Gatekeeper supports background caching and auditing. It can replicate Kubernetes objects into OPA’s datastore, allowing policies to reference other cluster resources—for example, “deny this Ingress if any other Ingress has the same hostname.” The audit controller periodically scans resources against policies and records any violations in the Constraint status fields, helping with governance and reporting.
In summary, Gatekeeper enhances the Kubernetes control plane in two key ways: policy enforcement at admission time and continuous auditing. With OPA Gatekeeper, you get both without altering core Kubernetes components, maintaining clean integration with the API server and respecting Kubernetes’ design principles.
Next, we’ll dive deeper into Constraints and explore a real-world example.
ConstraintTemplates and Constraints
A ConstraintTemplate is a core concept in OPA Gatekeeper. This Kubernetes Custom Resource Definition (CRD) defines new policy types, acting as blueprints that include both Rego evaluation code and parameter schemas for different policy scenarios.
When you create a ConstraintTemplate, you effectively introduce a new constraint type to the Kubernetes API. For example, a template named K8sRequiredLabels generates a corresponding constraint kind called K8sRequiredLabels. Each template has two main components:
- Targets & Rego: This is the policy code that runs on admission requests. In Gatekeeper, the target is typically admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh, which applies to Kubernetes object admission events. The Rego code outputs violation[] or deny[] rules whenever a policy is violated, prompting Gatekeeper to block the request with a clear explanatory message.
- CRD Schema: This defines the structure of spec.parameters that users supply in Constraints. By parameterizing templates, administrators can reuse the same policy logic across different scenarios, specifying inputs like required labels or allowed value ranges.
ConstraintTemplates by themselves don’t enforce policies—they become active only when Constraints, which are instances of the templates, are created. The typical workflow is to apply a ConstraintTemplate (registering the policy type) and then create Constraints to enforce the policy. Gatekeeper compiles Rego from all active templates and applies policies wherever corresponding Constraints exist.
This approach encourages reusability and separation of concerns: policy authors write generic templates, while cluster administrators instantiate them with organization-specific configurations. For instance, the K8sRequiredLabels template could generate multiple Constraints—one enforcing an owner label on Deployments and another enforcing an environment label on Namespaces.
A Real-World Policy Example: Enforcing Required Labels
To make this more concrete, consider a scenario where every Kubernetes Namespace must include specific labels—such as department or owner—to improve governance and auditing. OPA Gatekeeper makes this straightforward to enforce.
1. ConstraintTemplate Example – Required Labels Policy
apiVersion: [templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1beta1](http://templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1beta1)
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8srequiredlabels
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sRequiredLabels
validation:
openAPIV3Schema:
properties:
message:
type: string
labels:
type: array
items:
type: string
targets:
target: [admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh](http://admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh/)
rego: |
package k8srequiredlabels
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
required := input.parameters.labels
provided := input.review.object.metadata.labels
missing := required[_]
not provided[missing]
msg := sprintf("Missing required label: %v", [missing])
}
Using a ConstraintTemplate, you can define a new policy type called K8sRequiredLabels. This template specifies parameters such as a message (a string to display when the policy is violated) and a list of labels (an array of strings) that must be present. The embedded Rego code then evaluates incoming Kubernetes objects, ensuring that all required labels exist. If a Namespace is missing any specified labels, Gatekeeper rejects the request with a clear explanation.
Constraint Example: Enforcing Labels on Namespaces
To enforce the policy defined in the K8sRequiredLabels template, you create a Constraint that instantiates the template.
apiVersion: constraints.gatekeeper.sh/v1beta1
kind: K8sRequiredLabels
metadata:
name: namespace-must-have-owner-and-env
spec:
match:
kinds:
- apiGroups: [""]
kinds: ["Namespace"]
parameters:
message: "Namespaces must have 'owner' and 'environment' labels."
labels:
- owner
- environment
For example, a Constraint named namespace-must-have-owner-and-env uses the K8sRequiredLabels template. It targets Namespace objects and requires that each Namespace includes both owner and environment labels. If someone attempts to create a Namespace without these labels, Gatekeeper blocks the request and returns the message defined in the Constraint, ensuring consistent policy enforcement across your cluster.
Getting Started with OPA Gatekeeper
Setting up OPA Gatekeeper in your Kubernetes cluster is straightforward. You can install it using Helm or by applying the raw YAML manifests—both approaches are well-documented in the official Gatekeeper guides.
Once Gatekeeper is installed, follow these steps:
- Deploy ConstraintTemplates: Begin by deploying the ConstraintTemplates that define the types of policies you want to enforce. A library of common templates is available in the Gatekeeper policy library to help you get started.
- Create Constraints: Instantiate Constraints from your templates, specifying the parameters and the Kubernetes resources they should govern.
- Test your policies: Always test policies in a non-production environment first. Confirm that they enforce the desired rules without accidentally blocking legitimate operations.
- Monitor and audit: Leverage Gatekeeper’s audit capabilities to continuously monitor your cluster, detect policy violations, and maintain compliance.
The best way to begin is by implementing a simple policy—for example, requiring specific labels on resources or enforcing resource limits. This helps you get familiar with the ConstraintTemplate/Constraint workflow and how Rego evaluates policies. Once comfortable, you can gradually expand to more complex policies as your organization’s needs grow.
Conclusion
OPA Gatekeeper offers a powerful, Kubernetes-native approach to implementing policy-as-code across your clusters. By combining the flexibility of OPA with seamless integration into Kubernetes, it allows you to enforce security and compliance policies consistently and reliably. The ConstraintTemplate/Constraint pattern ensures that policies are reusable, maintainable, and easy to manage, while Gatekeeper’s audit functionality provides continuous visibility into compliance across your cluster.
Getting started is simple: begin with straightforward policies, such as enforcing labels or resource limits, and gradually expand your policy library as you gain confidence with the system. With OPA Gatekeeper, you can strengthen your cluster’s security posture without disrupting existing Kubernetes workflows.
Top comments (0)