I've been a professional C, Perl, PHP and Python developer.
I'm an ex-sysadmin from the late 20th century.
These days I do more Javascript and CSS and whatnot, and promote UX and accessibility.
I've been a professional C, Perl, PHP and Python developer.
I'm an ex-sysadmin from the late 20th century.
These days I do more Javascript and CSS and whatnot, and promote UX and accessibility.
I know what you're getting at. But pure CSS to me means using the elements that are already there, and no more.
If you're allowing adding HTML, then you may as well say, "Let's have 1920x1080 DIVs and give them all unique IDs", because then "Pure CSS" will let you do full HD video, and it all becomes meaningless.
To me, pure CSS is what you could apply to an existing page without having to ask the authors to change their markup.
I've been a professional C, Perl, PHP and Python developer.
I'm an ex-sysadmin from the late 20th century.
These days I do more Javascript and CSS and whatnot, and promote UX and accessibility.
It needs a bunch of HTML to back it up? There are several DIVs there whose sole purpose is presentation.
Pure CSS does not mean zero HTML, you need HTML elements to apply the CSS to.
I know what you're getting at. But pure CSS to me means using the elements that are already there, and no more.
If you're allowing adding HTML, then you may as well say, "Let's have 1920x1080 DIVs and give them all unique IDs", because then "Pure CSS" will let you do full HD video, and it all becomes meaningless.
To me, pure CSS is what you could apply to an existing page without having to ask the authors to change their markup.
Iβve always thought developers meant βno JavaScriptβ when they say pure CSS/ HTML.
Semantics aside, Iβd say this is pretty impressive right?
Nobody says that though, they say "Pure CSS". It's kind of a trend.
Yes, it looks really good!