The Ethical Dilemma of Cybersecurity: When Disclosure Becomes a Crime

Over the past three decades, the disclosure of software vulnerabilities and data breaches has gained wider acceptance. However, in many countries, researchers and whistleblowers still risk lawsuits and criminal charges when reporting security flaws. Rather than being rewarded for strengthening cybersecurity, many professionals find themselves entangled in legal battles, a worrying trend that threatens the future of ethical security research.

A Global Crackdown on Cybersecurity Researchers

Several recent incidents highlight the growing hostility toward cybersecurity professionals who report vulnerabilities:

• Turkey: In April 2022, Turkish journalist İbrahim Haskoloğlu was arrested after exposing a government data breach. Rather than investigating the breach, authorities targeted the journalist, and a new law now threatens whistleblowers with up to five years in prison for allegedly false reports.
• Malta: Three computer-science students and their lecturer at the University of Malta will face trial for responsibly disclosing vulnerabilities in FreeHour, a scheduling service. The company accused them of extortion despite their ethical intent.
• Poland: Ethical hackers who bypassed a kill switch in a train system faced legal threats from the manufacturer, despite their actions preventing operational failures.
• United States: Even in the U.S., whistleblowers are at risk. In 2024, Columbus, Ohio, sued David L. Ross, accusing him of colluding with hackers after he disputed the severity of a breach. The lawsuit was only dropped after two months.

These cases underscore a troubling reality: cybersecurity researchers are increasingly treated as criminals instead of allies in the fight against cyber threats.

The Need for Responsible Disclosure Protections

At Network Intelligence, we believe ethical security research should be protected and encouraged. Vulnerability disclosure should not be a legal minefield but a well-structured process that benefits both organizations and the cybersecurity community. Ethical hackers, security researchers, and whistleblowers play a critical role in identifying threats before cybercriminals can exploit them.

To foster a safer environment for disclosure, organizations and governments should adopt:

• Clear Safe Harbor Policies: Companies must establish responsible disclosure programs that protect researchers from legal repercussions when they report vulnerabilities in good faith.
• Bug Bounty Programs: Incentivizing security research through official programs ensures that vulnerabilities are reported directly to companies instead of being exploited.
• Legislative Protections: Governments should draft laws that distinguish ethical security research from malicious hacking. Countries like the United States have made progress with laws like the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act, but many nations still criminalize responsible disclosure.

*Navigating the Legal Landscape: What Researchers Can Do
*
Until global policies catch up, cybersecurity professionals must take proactive steps to protect themselves:

1. Obtain Permission First: Where possible, security researchers should seek authorization before testing a system.
2. Use Coordinated Disclosure Channels: Working with established bug bounty programs or third-party mediators can provide a layer of legal protection.
3. Document Everything: Keeping records of communications and intent can help researchers defend against wrongful accusations.
4. Know Local Laws: Understanding cybersecurity laws in different jurisdictions can prevent inadvertent legal issues.

*The Future of Vulnerability Disclosure: A Call for Action
*
As global cyber threats continue to rise, silencing researchers only benefits cybercriminals. Governments and corporations must recognize that cybersecurity is a collective effort—one that requires cooperation, not prosecution. At Network Intelligence, we remain committed to advocating for ethical cybersecurity research and responsible disclosure practices that protect both businesses and researchers alike.

The choice is clear: we can either foster an environment where vulnerabilities are addressed transparently, or we can push researchers into the shadows—where the real threats lurk.