I'm a fan of Open Source and have a growing interest in serverless and edge computing. I'm not a big fan of spiders, but they're doing good work eating bugs. I also stream on Twitch.
@nickytonline@seanolad
. It is explained here popper.js.org/docs/v2/tippy/ by the Popper.js documentation and here atomiks.github.io/tippyjs/v6/motiv... by the Tippy.js documentation. Popper.js is positioning engine (a more raw solution) and it used by Tippy.js for positioning their ready to use tooltips. With Popper you have all the control whether with Tippy you have styles and other features already built.
Popper.js and Tippy.js are both made by github, which is cool btw, but the main difference seems to be that tippy.js is for the looks and properties of the tooltip, but popper.js seems to add a more dynamic feel to the tooltips, and also reduces on the style aspect of the tooltip.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Any idea how it compares to popper.js?
@nickytonline @seanolad . It is explained here popper.js.org/docs/v2/tippy/ by the Popper.js documentation and here atomiks.github.io/tippyjs/v6/motiv... by the Tippy.js documentation. Popper.js is positioning engine (a more raw solution) and it used by Tippy.js for positioning their ready to use tooltips. With Popper you have all the control whether with Tippy you have styles and other features already built.
Popper.js and Tippy.js are both made by github, which is cool btw, but the main difference seems to be that tippy.js is for the looks and properties of the tooltip, but popper.js seems to add a more dynamic feel to the tooltips, and also reduces on the style aspect of the tooltip.