DEV Community

Cover image for Not Every Project Needs a Deployment Pipeline
zhenqiang
zhenqiang

Posted on

Not Every Project Needs a Deployment Pipeline

This is the second post in a short series about shipping small, fast-moving web projects.

In the previous post, we used a hackathon-style scenario: a static submission page needed a public link under time pressure.

The point wasn’t a specific number of seconds.

It was context.


The Default Is “Treat Everything Like Production”

Modern development culture has normalized a default workflow:

  • Git repository
  • CI configuration
  • Automated deployment
  • Hosting + environment decisions

Even when the “project” is:

  • A temporary landing page
  • A frontend-only demo
  • A hackathon submission
  • A two-day experiment

That default isn’t wrong.

It’s just often unexamined.


A Simple Lens: Lifespan × Risk

Before reaching for a pipeline, it helps to ask two questions:

1) How long will this live?

2) How costly is failure?

The goal is proportionality: the smaller the project, the smaller the ceremony.


Three Categories of Projects

1) Long-Lived Systems (High Risk, High ROI)

Production SaaS. Team-owned services. Revenue paths.

You want CI/CD here because you need:

  • Repeatable builds
  • Rollbacks
  • Monitoring + alerts
  • Change control

This is the world pipelines were built for.


2) Medium-Term Projects (Moderate Risk)

Portfolios, docs sites, internal tools.

Automation helps — but the “pipeline” should stay proportional:

  • Minimal steps
  • Few moving parts
  • Low maintenance overhead

3) Short-Lived, Fast-Moving Static Projects (Low Risk)

Hackathon demos. Temporary pages. Frontend-only prototypes.

These projects often:

  • Live for days or weeks
  • Don’t have a backend
  • Don’t need environment variables
  • Mostly need one thing: a public URL

Example output page:

This is what a published static demo page looks like on MyVibe.

And yet we often deploy them like production systems.


The Hidden Cost: Attention

For small projects, the cost of over-engineering isn’t money.

It’s attention.

It’s switching from:

Improve the demo

to:

Configure the pipeline

That context switch introduces friction.

And friction slows iteration.


Quick Rule of Thumb

If the project has users who depend on it, needs rollbacks, or has secrets/configuration, use CI/CD.

If it’s a static demo page with no backend and no env vars, optimize for “publish a link” instead.


A Category Worth Optimizing

There’s a category of work where publishing should feel lightweight:

  • Static
  • Self-contained
  • Short-lived

In that context, the best workflow is often:

run one command → get a link

In the final post, I’ll walk through the workflow behind that one-command publish — and the constraints that make it possible.


Series: Shipping Small Projects

Top comments (1)

Collapse
 
nate_gu profile image
NateGu ⚡ vibe coder

Agree so much!