Choosing the Right Real-Time Stream Processing Framework

Introduction

In the dynamic realm of real-time stream processing, tools like ksqlDB, Apache Spark, Apache Flink, Apache Storm, Timeplus Proton, and RisingWave each offer distinct advantages tailored to diverse use cases and requirements. This article delves into these leading stream processing frameworks' unique capabilities, use cases, and pros and cons.

ksqlDB

ksqlDB simplifies real-time stream processing by providing a SQL-based layer over Apache Kafka Streams, ensuring seamless integration within Kafka environments.

Use Cases

• Materialized Cache: Build and serve incrementally updated stateful views. Useful for applications requiring up-to-date information without continuous database queries.
• Streaming ETL Pipeline: Manipulate in-flight data to connect arbitrary sources and sinks. Facilitates seamless real-time data integration across systems.
• Event-Driven Microservices: Trigger changes based on observed event patterns in a stream. Ideal for real-time notifications, monitoring, and automated decision-making systems.
• Stream Processing Cookbook: Use predefined recipes to quickly implement common streaming data tasks, which benefits beginners and experienced users.

Pros

• Strong Kafka Integration: Built-in integration with Apache Kafka for streamlined event-streaming applications.
• Low Latency: Delivers latency as low as ten milliseconds, ideal for real-time analytics.
• SQL Interface: Familiar SQL interface for easy adoption.
• Fault Tolerance: Built-in fault tolerance mechanisms.

Cons

• Limited Analytics Capability: Lags behind competitors like Flink and Spark in advanced analytics tools.
• Learning Curve: Slightly steeper learning curve compared to simpler frameworks.
• ETL Limitations: Not ideal for complex ETL operations. Checkpointing Challenges: Advanced checkpointing mechanisms are lacking, impacting exact-once processing in complex scenarios.

Apache Spark (Structured Streaming)

Apache Spark offers scalability and flexibility through its Structured Streaming component, supporting batch and stream processing.

Use Cases

• Streaming ETL: Continuously clean and aggregate data before pushing it into data repositories, simplifying conventional ETL processes.
• Data Enrichment: Combine live and historical data for real-time analysis, enhancing data quality for personalized marketing efforts.
• Trigger Event Detection: Detect and respond to unusual patterns or events in real-time, such as fraudulent transactions or critical health alerts.
• Complex Session Analysis: Analyze user activities in real-time, continuously updating machine learning models. Used by companies like Netflix for real-time show recommendations.

Pros

• Language Support: Supports Scala, Java, Python, R, C#, F#.
• Community Support: Extensive community and ecosystem support.
• Exact-Once Processing: Ensures exactly-once processing semantics.
• Versatility: Integrates well with diverse data sources beyond Kafka.
• SQL Capabilities: Supports SQL for querying and processing.

Cons

• Micro-Batch Processing: Operates on micro-batch processing, potentially limiting ultra-low latency applications.
• High Memory Consumption: In-memory processing architecture can lead to high memory usage.
• Complexity: Deployment and management complexity, particularly in large-scale environments.
• Integration Challenges: Direct SQL querying on Kafka topics is not straightforward.

Apache Flink

Apache Flink excels in low-latency, high-throughput stream processing with unified APIs for both batch and stream processing.

Use Cases

• Event-Driven Applications: Real-time fraud detection, anomaly detection, rule-based alerting, business process monitoring, and handling real-time user interactions in social networks.
• Data Analytics Applications: Quality monitoring of telco networks, product updates analysis, ad-hoc analysis of live data, and large-scale graph analysis.
• Data Pipeline Applications: Real-time search index building and continuous ETL in e-commerce environments.

Pros

• Low Latency: Minimal latency and high throughput suitable for demanding real-time applications.
• Unified API: Simplifies development with a unified API for batch and stream processing.
• Advanced Analytics: Offers advanced analytical functions and robust state management.
• Exactly-Once Processing: Supports exactly-once processing semantics.
• Windowing Support: Flexible windowing capabilities based on both time and count.

Cons

• Integration Complexity: Integration with other big data ecosystems like Hadoop/Hive can be challenging.
• Limited Language Support: Supports Java, Scala, Python, and SQL, limiting language flexibility.
• Community Size: Smaller community compared to Apache Spark, potentially affecting support availability.
• Learning Curve: Requires some learning effort, especially for complex use cases.

Timeplus Proton

Timeplus Proton leverages ClickHouse for efficient, high-speed streaming SQL processing with an Apache 2.0 open-source license.

Use Cases

• FinTech: Real-time post-trade analytics and real-time pricing for financial instruments.
• DevOps: Real-time observability, metering for usage-based pricing, and real-time GitHub insights.
• Security Compliance: SOC2 compliance dashboards and alerts, container vulnerability monitoring, monitoring superblocks user activities, and protecting sensitive information in Slack.
• IoT: Real-time fleet monitoring and real-time sensor data from smartphones.
• Video Streaming: Analyzing Livepeer video engagement metrics.
• Customer 360: Auth0 notifications for new signups, HubSpot custom dashboards/alerts, Jitsu clickstream analysis, and real-time Twitter marketing.
• Misc: Wildfire monitoring and alerting, and data-driven parenting tasks.

Pros

• High Performance: Utilizes ClickHouse for efficient data processing and storage.
• Low Latency: Designed for minimal latency and efficient resource usage.
• Flexibility: Supports various data sources beyond Kafka.
• Open Source: Apache 2.0 licensed, offering flexibility and community support.

Cons

• Limited Kafka Integration: Not deeply integrated with Kafka-specific features compared to other solutions.
• Use Case Specific: More suited for specific use cases rather than general-purpose stream processing.

RisingWave

RisingWave, built in Rust, emphasizes efficient I/O handling and lightweight scaling with a custom storage engine for SQL-based stream processing.

Use Cases

• Streaming ETL: Continuous data transformation and integration.
• Real-Time Analytics: On-the-fly data analysis and reporting.
• Event-Driven Applications: Real-time event processing and decision-making.

Pros

• Efficient I/O Operations: Optimized for high-performance I/O handling.
• LSM-Tree Based Engine: Efficient data management with an LSM-Tree-based storage engine.
• SQL Support: Provides SQL-based stream processing with materialized views.
• Global Checkpoints: Ensures consistent results with frequent global checkpoints.

Cons

• Limited Ecosystem and Community Support: As a newer framework, it may have limited ecosystem integrations and community support.
• Scalability Considerations: Scalability challenges may arise as it grows and scales out.

Apache Storm

Apache Storm is an open-source distributed stream processing engine. Mainly written in Java and Clojure, it gained popularity after being acquired by Twitter in 2011. Storm can be considered a pioneer in real-time distributed stream processing.

Use Cases

• Real-Time Analytics: Used by companies like Spotify for real-time monitoring and analytics.
• Online Machine Learning: Suitable for continuous computation and distributed machine learning tasks.
• ETL Processes: Handles complex ETL tasks efficiently.
• Distributed RPC: Enables distributed remote procedure calls for real-time applications.

Pros

• Real-Time Processing: Designed for low-latency, high-throughput applications.
• Flexibility: Can be used with any programming language and integrates well with various data sources.
• Scalability: Capable of processing over a million tuples per second per node.
• Fault Tolerance: Ensures reliable processing with built-in fault tolerance mechanisms.

Cons

• Complexity: Requires careful setup and configuration; can be tricky to install and integrate with other technologies.
• Limited Windowing Support: Lacks robust support for event-based time management and windowing.
• API Limitations: Does not provide high-level APIs like SQL natively, making it harder for new developers to adopt.
• State Management: Stateless by default, which can complicate fault tolerance and recovery mechanisms.

Conclusion

Choosing the right stream processing framework depends on specific requirements such as latency, scalability, integration needs, and operational complexity. Each tool offers unique strengths and trade-offs, making it crucial to align them with project goals and constraints:

• ksqlDB excels in Kafka-centric environments but may not meet advanced analytics needs.
• Apache Spark (Structured Streaming) provides extensive community support and exact-once processing but operates on micro-batch processing.
• Apache Flink is optimal for low-latency, high-analytics environments with a unified API but requires careful integration.
• Timeplus Proton offers high performance and flexibility with minimal latency but lacks deep Kafka integration.
• RisingWave focuses on efficient I/O handling and SQL-based processing, suitable for specialized applications but with scalability considerations.
• Apache Storm provides robust real-time processing capabilities but comes with a steeper learning curve and limited high-level API support.

Additional Insights from Streaming Databases

In today’s data-driven landscape, streaming databases like RisingWave and ksqlDB stand out for their ability to handle high-speed, real-time data ingestion and processing. Unlike stream processing engines focused solely on real-time data manipulation, streaming databases integrate storage capabilities, enabling seamless real-time querying and analytics. This unique combination positions them as pivotal tools for organizations aiming to harness real-time insights and maintain a competitive advantage in a fast-paced digital environment.

References

Streaming Databases: Everything You Wanted to Know
Timeplus vs. ksqlDB
Proton: An Open-Source Alternative to ksqlDB for Streaming Processing
Introducing KSQL: Streaming SQL for Apache Kafka
Choosing a Stream Processing System?
Kafka Streams and ksqlDB Compared – How to Choose
Flink vs. Kafka: A Quick Guide to Stream Processing Engines
Comparing ksqlDB, Spark SQL, and Flink SQL
RisingWave vs ksqlDB
What’s the Difference Between Kafka and Spark?
Why I Recommend My Clients NOT Use KSQL and Kafka StreamsApache Flink vs Apache Storm: Which Tool is Better for Your Next Project?
Kafka Streams vs. Apache Flink vs. Apache Storm: Stream Processing Showdown
Life Happens in Real Time, Not in Batches: Choosing a Data Streaming Platform and Stream Processing Engine

Comments

[Alejandro Guida]

Take a look to ekuiper.org/, which is a Stream Processor for IoT, but with really cool features, and is really "cheap" about hardware resources used.