π
Modern data engineering is shifting from tool-driven ETL to code-first, modular pipelines. In this post, Iβll walk through how I migrated legacy Matillion workflows to a scalable architecture using dbt and Databricks.
π§©** _
Problem Statement
_**
We had multiple Matillion mappings handling core business entities like:
- Company
- Department
- Group
- Class / Sub-Class
- Supplier / Supplier Site
- Barcode
Challenges:
- Tight coupling between jobs
- Limited reusability
- Difficult debugging and lineage tracking
- Inconsistent data quality validation
ποΈ Target Architecture
We redesigned the system using a medallion architecture, where data flows through multiple refinement layers:
- Bronze β Raw ingestion
- Silver β Cleaned & validated data
- Gold β Business-ready datasets
This layered approach improves data quality progressively as it moves downstream ([Databricks Documentation][1]).
π Migration Strategy
1. Decomposing Matillion Mappings
Each Matillion job was broken down into:
- Source extraction
- Joins & filters
- Aggregations
Then rewritten as modular dbt models.
π§± Layered Modeling Approach
-
Staging (
stg_*) β Raw cleanup -
Intermediate (
int_*) β Business logic reuse -
Marts (
dim_*,fct_*) β Analytics-ready tables
Example:
stg_supplier β int_supplier_enriched β dim_supplier
β‘ Incremental Processing
Instead of full refresh pipelines:
- Used
updated_atbased filtering - Applied incremental models
π Result: Reduced compute cost and faster execution
π§ͺ Data Validation Strategy (Critical Step)
Ensuring parity with production was the most critical step.
βοΈ Validation Techniques
- Row count validation
- Aggregation checks (SUM, COUNT)
- Sample-level validation
- Hash-based comparison
β Data Quality Framework in dbt
Implemented both standard and custom tests:
- Not Null
- Unique
- Relationships (FK integrity)
- Accepted Values
- Freshness checks
β‘ Performance Optimization
- Incremental models for large tables
- Partitioning (Delta tables)
- Optimized joins
π Key Challenges
1. Hidden Dependencies
Solved using dbt DAG (ref())
2. Data Mismatch
Resolved via structured reconciliation
3. Job Variables
Converted into dbt macros
π Outcome
β Improved maintainability
β Standardized SQL transformations
β Strong data quality enforcement
β Reduced runtime and cost
β Clear lineage and traceability
π‘ Key Takeaway
This migration wasnβt just tool replacementβit was a shift to:
π Modular data engineering
π Version-controlled transformations
π Reliable, testable pipelines
π Final Thoughts
If you're still using legacy ETL tools, moving to dbt can drastically improve:
- Development speed
- Debugging
- Data trust Happy to discuss dbt + Databricks architectures or migration strategies!
Top comments (0)