DEV Community

RASMIN BHALLA
RASMIN BHALLA

Posted on

Migrating Legacy ETL to Modern Data Stack: Matillion dbt on Databricks

πŸš€

Modern data engineering is shifting from tool-driven ETL to code-first, modular pipelines. In this post, I’ll walk through how I migrated legacy Matillion workflows to a scalable architecture using dbt and Databricks.


🧩** _

Problem Statement

_**

We had multiple Matillion mappings handling core business entities like:

  • Company
  • Department
  • Group
  • Class / Sub-Class
  • Supplier / Supplier Site
  • Barcode

Challenges:

  • Tight coupling between jobs
  • Limited reusability
  • Difficult debugging and lineage tracking
  • Inconsistent data quality validation

πŸ—οΈ Target Architecture

We redesigned the system using a medallion architecture, where data flows through multiple refinement layers:

  • Bronze β†’ Raw ingestion
  • Silver β†’ Cleaned & validated data
  • Gold β†’ Business-ready datasets

This layered approach improves data quality progressively as it moves downstream ([Databricks Documentation][1]).


πŸ”„ Migration Strategy

1. Decomposing Matillion Mappings

Each Matillion job was broken down into:

  • Source extraction
  • Joins & filters
  • Aggregations

Then rewritten as modular dbt models.


🧱 Layered Modeling Approach

  • Staging (stg_*) β†’ Raw cleanup
  • Intermediate (int_*) β†’ Business logic reuse
  • Marts (dim_*, fct_*) β†’ Analytics-ready tables

Example:

stg_supplier β†’ int_supplier_enriched β†’ dim_supplier
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

⚑ Incremental Processing

Instead of full refresh pipelines:

  • Used updated_at based filtering
  • Applied incremental models

πŸ‘‰ Result: Reduced compute cost and faster execution


πŸ§ͺ Data Validation Strategy (Critical Step)

Ensuring parity with production was the most critical step.

βœ”οΈ Validation Techniques

  • Row count validation
  • Aggregation checks (SUM, COUNT)
  • Sample-level validation
  • Hash-based comparison

βœ… Data Quality Framework in dbt

Implemented both standard and custom tests:

  • Not Null
  • Unique
  • Relationships (FK integrity)
  • Accepted Values
  • Freshness checks

⚑ Performance Optimization

  • Incremental models for large tables
  • Partitioning (Delta tables)
  • Optimized joins

πŸ” Key Challenges

1. Hidden Dependencies

Solved using dbt DAG (ref())

2. Data Mismatch

Resolved via structured reconciliation

3. Job Variables

Converted into dbt macros

πŸ“Š Outcome

βœ” Improved maintainability
βœ” Standardized SQL transformations
βœ” Strong data quality enforcement
βœ” Reduced runtime and cost
βœ” Clear lineage and traceability


πŸ’‘ Key Takeaway

This migration wasn’t just tool replacementβ€”it was a shift to:

πŸ‘‰ Modular data engineering
πŸ‘‰ Version-controlled transformations
πŸ‘‰ Reliable, testable pipelines


πŸ‘‹ Final Thoughts

If you're still using legacy ETL tools, moving to dbt can drastically improve:

  • Development speed
  • Debugging
  • Data trust Happy to discuss dbt + Databricks architectures or migration strategies!

Top comments (0)