DEV Community

sachinkg12
sachinkg12

Posted on

Why double Loses Precision and How to Avoid It in Java

When working with floating-point numbers in Java, you might notice that double occasionally produces unexpected or imprecise results. This behavior can lead to bugs, especially in financial applications or scenarios requiring high precision.

In this post, we’ll dive deep into the root cause of this issue, explain how to avoid it, provide a working example, and explore whether newer Java versions offer better alternatives.

Why Does double Lose Precision?

1. IEEE 754 Floating-Point Standard

The double data type in Java follows the IEEE 754 standard for floating-point arithmetic. It represents numbers in binary format using:

  • 1 bit for the sign,
  • 11 bits for the exponent,
  • 52 bits for the fraction (mantissa).

This binary representation introduces limitations:

  • Finite Precision: double can only represent numbers up to 15–17 decimal digits accurately.
  • Rounding Errors: Many decimal fractions (e.g., 0.1) cannot be precisely represented in binary, leading to rounding errors.

For example, in binary:

  • 0.1 becomes an infinitely repeating fraction, which gets truncated for storage, introducing slight imprecision.

2. Accumulated Errors in Arithmetic

Operations involving double can accumulate errors:

  • Repeated additions/subtractions amplify rounding errors.
  • Multiplications/divisions may lose precision due to truncation.

This behavior is inherent to floating-point arithmetic and is not unique to Java.


Working Example: Precision Loss with double

Here’s an example demonstrating the issue:

public class DoublePrecisionLoss {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        double num1 = 0.1;
        double num2 = 0.2;
        double sum = num1 + num2;

        System.out.println("Expected sum: 0.3");
        System.out.println("Actual sum: " + sum);

        // Comparison
        if (sum == 0.3) {
            System.out.println("Sum is equal to 0.3");
        } else {
            System.out.println("Sum is NOT equal to 0.3");
        }
    }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Output:

Expected sum: 0.3
Actual sum: 0.30000000000000004
Sum is NOT equal to 0.3
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The result, 0.30000000000000004, highlights the rounding error caused by binary representation. Even though the difference is minuscule, it can lead to significant issues in critical systems.


How to Avoid Precision Loss

1. Use BigDecimal for Precise Calculations

The BigDecimal class in Java provides arbitrary-precision arithmetic, making it ideal for scenarios requiring high accuracy, such as financial calculations.

Example Using BigDecimal:

import java.math.BigDecimal;

public class BigDecimalExample {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        BigDecimal num1 = new BigDecimal("0.1");
        BigDecimal num2 = new BigDecimal("0.2");
        BigDecimal sum = num1.add(num2);

        System.out.println("Expected sum: 0.3");
        System.out.println("Actual sum: " + sum);

        // Comparison
        if (sum.compareTo(new BigDecimal("0.3")) == 0) {
            System.out.println("Sum is equal to 0.3");
        } else {
            System.out.println("Sum is NOT equal to 0.3");
        }
    }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Output:

Expected sum: 0.3
Actual sum: 0.3
Sum is equal to 0.3
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

By using BigDecimal, the precision issues are eliminated, and comparisons yield the correct result.

2. Compare Using an Epsilon Value

Another approach to handling precision loss is comparing floating-point numbers with a tolerance (epsilon). This method checks if the numbers are “close enough” instead of relying on exact equality.

Example Using Epsilon Comparison:

public class EpsilonComparison {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        double num1 = 0.1;
        double num2 = 0.2;
        double sum = num1 + num2;
        double epsilon = 1e-9; // Define a small tolerance value

        System.out.println("Expected sum: 0.3");
        System.out.println("Actual sum: " + sum);

        // Comparison with epsilon
        if (Math.abs(sum - 0.3) < epsilon) {
            System.out.println("Sum is approximately equal to 0.3");
        } else {
            System.out.println("Sum is NOT approximately equal to 0.3");
        }
    }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Output:

Expected sum: 0.3
Actual sum: 0.30000000000000004
Sum is approximately equal to 0.3
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Why Use Epsilon Comparison?

  • Flexibility: It allows for minor differences due to rounding errors.
  • Simplicity: This method doesn’t require external libraries and is efficient.

Using Apache Commons Math for Enhanced Precision

Apache Commons Math is a library designed for complex mathematical computations. While it does not provide arbitrary-precision arithmetic like BigDecimal, it offers utilities that simplify numerical operations and minimize floating-point errors in certain scenarios.

Example: Using Precision.equals for Comparison

import org.apache.commons.math3.util.Precision;

public class ApacheCommonsExample {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        double num1 = 0.1;
        double num2 = 0.2;
        double sum = num1 + num2;

        System.out.println("Expected sum: 0.3");
        System.out.println("Actual sum: " + sum);

        // Comparison with tolerance
        if (Precision.equals(sum, 0.3, 1e-9)) {
            System.out.println("Sum is equal to 0.3");
        } else {
            System.out.println("Sum is NOT equal to 0.3");
        }
    }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Output:

Expected sum: 0.3
Actual sum: 0.30000000000000004
Sum is equal to 0.3
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Why Use Apache Commons Math?

  • Simplifies Comparisons: Precision.equals allows comparisons with a specified tolerance, making it easy to handle rounding errors.
  • Lightweight: The library provides focused tools for numerical computations without the overhead of BigDecimal.

Summary

  • Understand the Limitations: double is not inherently flawed but is unsuitable for high-precision tasks due to its binary floating-point representation.
  • Use BigDecimal When Necessary: For financial or critical calculations, BigDecimal ensures precision but may impact performance.
  • Leverage Libraries: Apache Commons Math provides utilities like Precision.equals to handle floating-point comparisons effectively.

By understanding the nuances of double and its alternatives, you can write more robust and accurate Java applications.


Let me know in the comments if you have encountered precision issues with double and how you tackled them! 😊

Image of Timescale

🚀 pgai Vectorizer: SQLAlchemy and LiteLLM Make Vector Search Simple

We built pgai Vectorizer to simplify embedding management for AI applications—without needing a separate database or complex infrastructure. Since launch, developers have created over 3,000 vectorizers on Timescale Cloud, with many more self-hosted.

Read more

Top comments (0)

Postmark Image

Speedy emails, satisfied customers

Are delayed transactional emails costing you user satisfaction? Postmark delivers your emails almost instantly, keeping your customers happy and connected.

Sign up