It’s not always fair to judge a language just by looking at how many flashy open-source projects it has on GitHub.
Here’s why:
1. Different Ecosystem Cultures
- Go (Golang) came out in 2009 with a strong open-source-first culture, backed by Google. Most Go developers are used to sharing libraries and tools on GitHub. That’s why we see projects like Docker, Kubernetes, Terraform, Prometheus, etc.
- Java, on the other hand, was born in the 1990s in a very enterprise-driven era. Most big Java projects ended up as closed-source commercial software (banking systems, ERPs, trading platforms, telecom billing, etc.). Many companies spent millions building them, so they never released them publicly.
2. Where Java Shines (but hidden from GitHub)
- Enterprise software: Banks, insurance, telecom, governments, healthcare, airlines — tons of their “mission-critical” apps are Java. These don’t live on GitHub.
- Premium apps: Large enterprise software products (SAP modules, Atlassian Jira/Confluence, Eclipse IDE, Android SDK tools, etc.) are Java-based, but not always open source.
- Closed-source frameworks: A lot of middleware, financial trading platforms, logistics and ERP backends, etc. are in Java but owned by companies.
3. Open-source bias
- Open source projects get visibility on GitHub.
- Closed-source projects may have 10x more code, complexity, and users, but we don’t see them.
- So Go looks more active in OSS, while Java has a ton of “invisible” production-grade software.
4. Different Goals
- Go was designed for cloud-native infrastructure → naturally leads to open-source tools.
- Java was designed for enterprise apps → naturally leads to proprietary systems.
👉 So, judging Java by its open-source GitHub activity would underestimate its real-world dominance. Java may not have as many trendy OSS projects, but it has an enormous footprint in critical closed-source systems that power banks, governments, telcos, and Fortune 500 companies.
Top comments (0)