If you saw my last post on the Fabric + Databricks power couple, you know I’m a big believer that Architecture > Tool Wars. But let’s be real: a great architecture is only as good as your ability to explain it without causing a headache.
For a long time, my diagrams looked like a plate of spicy Indiranagar street food—lots of random boxes and mystery arrows that made sense only to me (and maybe not even me by the next morning).
Then I started using the C4 Model daily. Total game-changer. Sanity restored.
The "Legendary" Origin (Bangalore Edition) 🇮🇳
The C4 model was created by Simon Brown. Officially, he’s a British engineer.
Unofficially? Local legends say he finalized the framework while stuck in a 4-hour Silk Board traffic jam.
The theory: if you can navigate Bengaluru using different levels of detail—from satellite traffic views down to the exact auto-rickshaw blocking your lane—you can do the same for software systems.
History may call this a myth. Bangalore residents know better.
What Exactly Is the C4 Model?
Think of C4 as Google Maps for your codebase.
It’s a hierarchical way to zoom into architecture so you don’t overload your audience with irrelevant detail.
🌍 Level 1: System Context
(The "Satellite View")
This is the view from space. Your system is a single black box, and you only care about how it interacts with:
- Users
- External systems
Who it’s for: Everyone
(Yes, including the CEO who doesn’t know a JSON from a Jalebi)
Goal:
Define boundaries.
Who uses us? What do we depend on?
📦 Level 2: Containers
(The "Koramangala View")
Now we zoom in. The box opens.
We see:
- Web apps
- Databases
- APIs
- Microservices
In my world, this is where Microsoft Fabric and Databricks show up as distinct containers.
Goal:
Map the tech stack and how data flows between services.
🧩 Level 3: Components
(The "Street View")
We’re inside a specific container now.
This is where real logic lives:
PaymentControllerIngestionServiceValidationEngine
Who it’s for: Developers and Tech Leads
Goal:
Explain how the guts of a service are structured.
💻 Level 4: Code
(The "Auto-Rickshaw View")
Maximum zoom.
Class diagrams. Code relationships. Implementation details.
Pro tip:
I rarely draw this. If you need a diagram here, your code might already be in trouble.
Why I’m Hooked (The Pros)
Audience-Right Detail
No Spark cluster configs for VPs. No hand-wavy fluff for engineers.Faster Onboarding
New joiners understand the system in minutes, not days.Communication > Ego
Forces clarity. Less box-dragging, more thinking about real system boundaries.
Final Thought
Architecture isn’t about picking the coolest tools.
It’s about making sure everyone is looking at the same map. 🤝
So—are you still drawing Random Boxes and Arrows,
or are you ready to zoom with C4?
Drop your thoughts in the comments. Let’s compare traffic routes. 🚦
Top comments (0)