Manual testing is not disappearing. Today, many companies are opting for automation testing to identify bugs early, reduce testing time, and minimize the need for manual testers. However, there are certain test scenarios that cannot be replaced by automation. Striking a balance between manual and automated testing is the smartest approach.
Human critical thinking, creativity, and logic cannot be replicated by AI or automated tools. Clarifying end-user questions, considering the priority and severity of an issue, and understanding the context of the problem are tasks that automation tools cannot handle effectively.
Some human qualities, such as the ability to understand and address issues raised in the product and identify their root causes, cannot be replaced by AI or automated tools. Debugging skills, critical thinking, and logic application based on real-world scenarios are essential and remain beyond the reach of automated systems. Additionally, analyzing market trends and adapting to new requirements during the software development lifecycle (SDLC) are areas where AI cannot fully replace human input.
Automated tools execute code based on predefined inputs or logic, which means they cannot perform real-time testing. This can lead to the oversight of complex scenarios or edge cases, resulting in unexpected issues that would typically be identified by an end user during app usage. Such missed issues can lead to product errors in real-world situations. For these critical tasks, manual testing remains irreplaceable.
While automated testing with AI can be highly effective for repetitive tasks, generating complex scenarios, and analyzing large datasets, human testers continue to play a critical role in applying insights, particularly when it comes to understanding user experience and ensuring product quality.
Top comments (0)