DEV Community

Cover image for SSR vs CSR vs SSG: Choosing the Right Rendering Strategy 🖥️⚡️
Saumya Aggarwal
Saumya Aggarwal

Posted on

SSR vs CSR vs SSG: Choosing the Right Rendering Strategy 🖥️⚡️

Introduction

When your users hit your site, they expect speed, SEO, and snappy interactions. Modern frameworks let you render pages in three ways:

  • CSR (Client-Side Rendering): The browser builds pages.
  • SSR (Server-Side Rendering): The server builds pages per request.
  • SSG (Static Site Generation): Pages are pre-built at deploy time.

Pick the wrong one and you’ll tank performance, SEO, or developer joy. In this guide, we’ll:

  1. Define each strategy with real-life analogies 🏠🛒📦
  2. Compare trade-offs in a handy table
  3. Offer a decision checklist to choose the best fit
  4. Highlight hybrid and incremental options in modern meta-frameworks

Let’s break it down!

1. Definitions at a Glance 🔍

Strategy HTML Built Where When Best For Caveats
CSR Browser On navigation Single-Page Apps, dashboards Blank first paint, SEO workarounds
SSR Server Every request Dynamic sites, SEO-critical Server load, latency under high traffic
SSG Build time (pipeline) Deploy time Blogs, docs, marketing pages Rebuild needed for new content

Analogies:

  • CSR is like cooking a meal at your table: fresh but takes time before you eat.
  • SSR is like ordering à la carte: chef cooks per order, tastes great but busy times slow things down.
  • SSG is like a buffet: food pre-made and ready—super fast, but limited menu and needs restocking.

2. Deep Dive

Client-Side Rendering (CSR) 💻

  • What happens? Server sends a light HTML shell + JS. Browser fetches data and renders.

  • Pros:

    • Fast transitions after load (SPA feel).
    • Rich interactivity.

  • Cons:

    • First load blank or spinner (tarpit).
    • Search engines need hydration or prerendering.

Server-Side Rendering (SSR) 🌐

  • What happens? Each request: server fetches data, builds full HTML, sends to browser.

  • Pros:

    • Instant first paint, SEO-friendly.
    • Personalized content per user.

  • Cons:

    • Higher server CPU & memory usage.
    • Could lag during traffic spikes without caching or edge.

Static Site Generation (SSG) 📦

  • What happens? At build time, framework crawls routes, generates HTML, and deploys to CDN.

  • Pros:

    • Ultra-fast loads, minimal runtime cost.
    • Automatic CDN caching.

  • Cons:

    • Content stale until next build.
    • Dynamic features need client-side JS or incremental builds.

3. When to Choose What ✔️

Question CSR SSR SSG
Real-time dashboard or SPA? ✅ ❌ ❌
Marketing site with rare updates? ❌ ❌/✅ ✅
Product catalog updated hourly? ❌ ✅ (with cache) Maybe (ISR)
Strict SEO & social media previews? Needs extra work ✅ ✅
Budget static hosting? ✅ ❌ ✅

Real-life analogy: You wouldn’t run a pop‑up restaurant out of a shipping container (SSR) when you just need pamphlets at a conference (SSG).

4. Hybrid & Incremental Options 🔄

Frameworks like Next.js, Nuxt, and SvelteKit let you mix strategies per route:

  • SSG for blog posts (getStaticProps).
  • SSR for checkout pages (getServerSideProps).
  • ISR (Incremental Static Regeneration) to rebuild only changed pages on demand.

Think of it as having à la carte, buffet, and cook‑to-order all in one restaurant.

Conclusion 🎉

  • CSR: Best for app‑style interactivity; needs extra SEO care.
  • SSR: Balances freshness & crawlability; watch server costs.
  • SSG: Delivers pure speed; rebuilds for new content.

No one size fits all—match the method to the job and leverage hybrid modes where you need the best of each. Your users (and Core Web Vitals) will thank you!

Top comments (0)