DEV Community

Rhea Kapoor
Rhea Kapoor

Posted on

Lessons from Rexera: Why Vector Database Architecture Makes or Breaks AI Agents

Let me be blunt: most AI agent implementations fail at retrieval. After analyzing Rexera’s real estate transaction system—where AI agents handle 10K+ tasks daily—I’ve seen how foundational infrastructure choices dictate success. Here’s what engineers should know.

1. The Scaling Wall We Hit

Why brute-force solutions collapse under real documents

Initial architecture:

  • Simple document parsing (<10 pages) via direct LLM ingestion
  • Deep Lake for vector storage → downloaded entire embeddings for similarity search
  • Self-hosted Milvus cluster managing Kubernetes scaling

The breaking point:

Processing 1,200-page mortgage packages exposed three critical failures:

Failure Mode Consequence
Embedding download latency 8-12s retrieval times per document
Bursty traffic handling K8s autoscaling lagged behind 500% traffic spikes
Multi-search overhead Elasticsearch + vector DB dual maintenance

What I’d diagnose today:

In 10M+ vector workloads, network I/O becomes the bottleneck. Rexera’s initial architecture forced data movement instead of pushing compute to storage—a fatal flaw for real-time transactions.

2. Why Hybrid Search Isn’t Optional

A technical deep dive on retrieval accuracy

Rexera’s 40% accuracy jump came from simultaneous vector + keyword filtering. Observe this PyMilvus snippet:

from pymilvus import connections, Collection, FieldSchema, DataType, CollectionSchema

# Hybrid query construction  
results = (  
    Collection("re_transactions")  
    .search(  
        data=query_embeddings,  
        anns_field="embedding",  
        param={"nprobe": 128},  
        limit=50,  
        expr='doc_type == "HOA" AND org_id == "rexera_west"',  # Metadata filter  
        output_fields=["page_content"]  
    )  
)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Key architectural insights:

  1. Filter-first strategy reduces vector search space by 60-90%
  2. Dense-sparse fusion at the ANN layer prevents post-filter misses
  3. Metadata partitioning enables tenant isolation without separate clusters

Benchmark note: Testing with 50M real estate docs showed hybrid search cut 99th percentile latency from 2.1s → 0.4s versus pure vector scan.

3. The Consistency Tradeoff Nobody Discusses

When "eventual" isn't eventual enough

AI agents making decisions on stale data cause catastrophic errors in legal workflows. Rexera’s solution:

# Strong consistency for document writes  
client = MilvusClient(  
    uri="zilliz-cloud-uri",  
    token="*****",  
    consistency_level="Strong"  # Critical for transaction documents  
)

# Session consistency for queries  
query_client = MilvusClient(consistency_level="Session")
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Consistency level impacts

Level Use Case Risk
Strong Document uploads/updates 2-3x higher latency
Bounded Time-sensitive validations Possible 5s staleness
Session Agent context retrieval May miss latest writes

Deployment tip: Use strong consistency only for active transaction documents. Archive data can use bounded/stale reads.

4. Agent-Specific Indexing Patterns

Optimizing for Iris vs. Mia workloads

Not all agents need the same retrieval profile:

Iris (document validation agent)

create_index(  
  field_name="embedding",  
  index_type="DISKANN",  # High recall for legal clauses  
  metric_type="IP"  
)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Mia (communication agent)

create_index(  
  field_name="embedding",  
  index_type="IVF_FLAT",  # Low latency for email history  
  params={"nlist": 16384}  
)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Performance observations:

  • DISKANN gave Iris 99% recall on obscure contract terms
  • IVF_FLAT kept Mia’s response latency <700ms during peak

Cost warning: DiskANN consumes 40% more memory than IVF_FLAT. Right-size per agent.

5. What I’d Change Today

Architectural refinements for 2025

Based on Rexera’s journey, here’s where I’d push further:

1. Dynamic partitioning by transaction stage

  • Active deals in high-consistency SSD tier
  • Closed deals in cost-effective object storage

2. Multi-tenant isolation

  • Physical separation for enterprise clients
  • Resource groups with guaranteed QPS

3. Model bake-offs

  • Test text-embedding-3-large vs. jina-embeddings-v2 on closing docs
  • Evaluate binary quantization for 60% memory reduction

Final Takeaways

Rexera’s success stems from architectural discipline:

  • Hybrid search isn’t optional for complex domains (40% accuracy lift proves this)
  • Consistency levels require agent-aware tuning - legal docs ≠ chat histories
  • Per-agent indexing unlocks better cost/performance than one-size-fits-all

The operational win? Killing Elasticsearch reduced their SRE toil by 15 hours/week. That’s the real vector database value: letting engineers focus on agents, not infrastructure.

Next exploration: Testing pgvector’s new hierarchical navigable small world (HNSW) implementation against dedicated vector DBs.

Top comments (0)