DEV Community

selfhosting.sh
selfhosting.sh

Posted on • Originally published at selfhosting.sh

AdGuard Home vs Technitium: Which DNS Server?

Quick Verdict

AdGuard Home is the better choice for most home networks. It's simpler to set up, has a cleaner UI for managing ad blocking, and covers 90% of what home users need. Choose Technitium if you need a full authoritative DNS server with zone hosting, split-horizon DNS, clustering, or advanced DNS features that go beyond ad blocking.

Overview

AdGuard Home is a network-wide ad blocker and DNS server with an intuitive web UI. It focuses on blocking ads, trackers, and malware at the DNS level while providing DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) and DNS-over-TLS (DoT). It's made by the team behind the AdGuard browser extension and VPN products.

Technitium DNS Server is a full-featured authoritative and recursive DNS server that also does ad blocking. It can host DNS zones, handle DNSSEC, serve as a DHCP server, provide DNS failover, and support DNS-over-HTTPS/TLS/QUIC. It's built on .NET and targets both home users and network administrators who need enterprise DNS features.

Feature Comparison

Feature AdGuard Home Technitium
Primary focus Ad blocking + DNS privacy Full DNS server + ad blocking
Web UI Clean, modern, simple Comprehensive, more complex
Ad blocking Built-in with filter lists Via "Advanced Blocking" app
DNS-over-HTTPS Yes Yes
DNS-over-TLS Yes Yes
DNS-over-QUIC Yes Yes
Authoritative DNS No Yes
Zone hosting No Yes
Split-horizon DNS No Yes
DHCP server Yes (basic) Yes (full-featured)
Clustering No Yes (v14+)
DNSSEC validation Yes Yes
Per-client rules Yes Yes (via client groups)
Conditional forwarding Yes Yes
Safe search enforcement Yes (Google, YouTube, Bing, etc.) No (not built-in)
Parental controls Yes No (use blocklists)
API REST API REST API
Runtime Go .NET 9
Docker image adguardteam/adguardhome:v0.107.71 technitium/dns-server:14.3.0
License GPL-3.0 GPL-3.0

Installation Complexity

AdGuard Home is straightforward. Single container, port 53 for DNS, port 3000 for initial setup (changes to 80 after), and a few config options. The setup wizard walks you through upstream DNS, blocklists, and client settings.

Technitium is slightly more complex. It needs a sysctl tweak (net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range), uses port 5380 for the web UI, and has significantly more configuration options. Environment variables only apply on first startup — after that, all configuration is managed through the web UI. The UI has a steeper learning curve due to the breadth of features.

Performance and Resource Usage

Metric AdGuard Home Technitium
RAM (idle) ~50 MB ~150 MB
RAM (with blocklists) ~100 MB ~250 MB
CPU Low (Go, compiled binary) Low-Medium (.NET runtime)
Disk ~100 MB ~200 MB
Startup time <5 seconds ~10 seconds

AdGuard Home is lighter. Technitium uses more memory due to the .NET runtime and the broader feature set. Neither is resource-intensive for a modern server.

Community and Support

AdGuard Home has 27,000+ GitHub stars, active development, regular releases, and backing from AdGuard Software (a commercial company with other products funding development). Documentation is solid but sometimes lags behind features.

Technitium has 5,000+ GitHub stars and is developed by a single developer (Shreyas Zare). Releases are regular, and the developer is responsive on forums. Documentation is thorough, especially for advanced DNS features. The project doesn't use GitHub Releases — versions are tracked via Docker Hub and the blog.

Use Cases

Choose AdGuard Home If...

  • Your primary goal is network-wide ad blocking
  • You want the simplest setup and cleanest UI
  • You need parental controls or safe search enforcement
  • You want a lighter footprint
  • You're migrating from Pi-hole and want a similar but modern experience
  • DNS privacy (DoH/DoT/DoQ) is your main concern

Choose Technitium If...

  • You need an authoritative DNS server (hosting your own zones)
  • You need split-horizon DNS for your network
  • You want a full-featured DHCP server alongside DNS
  • You need DNS clustering for high availability
  • You run a more complex network and need advanced DNS features
  • You want DNS-over-QUIC alongside other encrypted DNS options

Final Verdict

For home networks where ad blocking is the priority, AdGuard Home is the clear winner — it's simpler, lighter, and does the ad-blocking job better out of the box. Technitium is the right choice when you need actual DNS server capabilities beyond blocking ads. If you're debating between these two, ask yourself: "Do I need to host DNS zones?" If yes, Technitium. If no, AdGuard Home.

FAQ

Can I use both together?

Yes, but it's uncommon. You could use Technitium as your authoritative DNS server and forward queries through AdGuard Home for ad blocking. But Technitium's built-in blocking makes this unnecessary for most setups.

How do they compare to Pi-hole?

Pi-hole falls between these two. It's focused on ad blocking like AdGuard Home but with a less modern UI. It doesn't have authoritative DNS like Technitium. See our Pi-hole vs AdGuard Home and Pi-hole vs Technitium comparisons.

Which has better ad blocking?

AdGuard Home. It was purpose-built for ad blocking with filter list management, safe search, and parental controls as first-class features. Technitium's ad blocking is an "app" plugin — functional but not the primary focus.

Related

Top comments (0)