What defines quality could be user-dependent, or, could simply be controlled by the staff, but, whatever determines "quality" should be (and this is almost a given), fair.
@ben already created a post talking about how their are set of users called trusted users who have the ability to mark articles as low quality and high quality.
@ben already created a post talking about how their are set of users called trusted users who have the ability to mark articles as low quality and high quality.
Well, thank you for the information.
Yes, we are working hard to fight spam by flagging the bad post as spam to admins and marking the quality (high/low) of the posts.