The Intel Celeron N3150 is generally better than the Celeron J1900 due to its newer architecture and improved features, despite having lower clock speeds. Here's a concise breakdown:
Key Differences:
Architecture & Efficiency:
J1900 (Bay Trail, 2013): Older 22nm process, 10W TDP.
N3150 (Braswell, 2015): Newer 14nm process, 6W TDP. More power-efficient and cooler operation.
Performance:
Clock Speeds: J1900 (2.0–2.42 GHz) vs. N3150 (1.6–2.08 GHz). J1900 has higher clocks, but N3150’s modern architecture (Silvermont cores vs. Airmont) offers better IPC, leading to comparable or better multi-threaded performance.
Integrated Graphics: N3150’s HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) outperforms J1900’s HD Graphics (Bay Trail), supporting newer APIs (DirectX 11.2 vs. 11) and 4K video playback.
Features:
AES-NI Support: N3150 includes hardware encryption acceleration (useful for NAS/security), absent in J1900.
Memory Support: N3150 supports DDR3L-1600 vs. J1900’s DDR3L-1333, improving bandwidth.
I/O: Braswell chipsets (N3150) typically include USB 3.0 and SATA III, whereas J1900 platforms may lack these.
Use Cases:
Basic Tasks (Web, Office): Both handle these, but N3150’s efficiency benefits portable devices.
Media Playback: N3150 better for HD/4K streaming.
Light Servers/NAS: N3150’s AES-NI and efficiency make it superior.
Verdict:
The N3150 is the better choice for most users due to its modern architecture, power efficiency, and enhanced features. The J1900 may only be preferable in scenarios where its higher clock speeds marginally benefit legacy software, but this is rare. For general use, media, or light server tasks, the N3150’s advantages in efficiency, graphics, and security make it the clear winner.
https://www.sinsmarts.com/blog/celeron-j1900-vs-n3150-which-processor-is-better/
Top comments (0)