Remember when optimizing for one search engine felt complicated?
Good times.
Now we've got ChatGPT Search in the mix, and the rules are... different. Not completely different—there's overlap—but different enough that you can't just copy-paste your Google playbook and call it a day.
Here's the thing: by mid-2025, ChatGPT Search has carved out a legitimate chunk of search behavior, particularly among users who want conversational answers instead of ten blue links. Early data suggests somewhere between 8-12% of informational searches now start with AI chat interfaces rather than traditional search engines. That's not a majority, but it's not nothing either.
And if you're still optimizing content like it's 2019? You're leaving opportunities on the table.
This isn't about picking sides. It's about understanding how each platform works and adapting your content strategy accordingly. Because spoiler alert: the content that ranks #1 on Google doesn't always get cited by ChatGPT, and vice versa.
How ChatGPT Search Actually Works (The Parts That Matter)
ChatGPT Search doesn't crawl the web like Googlebot. It uses a combination of Bing's search infrastructure and its own language model to generate responses with citations. When someone asks a question, it searches for relevant content, synthesizes information from multiple sources, and presents an answer with attribution links.
The key difference? Google wants to send you to the best page. ChatGPT wants to answer your question directly and show you where it got the information.
This fundamentally changes what "optimization" means.
With Google, you're optimizing to be the destination. With ChatGPT Search, you're optimizing to be the source—the credible reference that gets cited in the synthesized answer. Sometimes that means more traffic. Sometimes it means less. (The jury's still out on which scenarios produce which outcomes, and it probably varies wildly by industry.)
What we do know: ChatGPT Search favors clear, structured information that's easy to extract and attribute. It also seems to weight recency heavily—content from the past 6-12 months gets cited more frequently than older evergreen pieces, even when the older content is objectively more comprehensive.
The Overlap: What Works for Both
Before we get into the differences, let's talk about what hasn't changed.
Good content is still good content. Clear writing, logical structure, accurate information—these fundamentals work everywhere. If your content is a disorganized mess that requires three reads to understand, neither Google nor ChatGPT is going to favor it.
Both platforms value:
Authoritative sources. Domain authority matters for Google's rankings. Source credibility matters for ChatGPT's citations. Build your site's reputation through quality content and legitimate backlinks, and you're helping both efforts simultaneously.
Structured data. Schema markup helps Google understand your content. It also helps ChatGPT extract specific information accurately. Product schema, FAQ schema, article schema—implement them. They're not optional anymore.
Clear headings and hierarchy. H2s and H3s that actually describe what's in each section make your content scannable for humans and parseable for algorithms. Both Google and ChatGPT use heading structure to understand content organization.
Mobile optimization and speed. Page experience signals matter for Google rankings. Loading speed affects whether ChatGPT's search component can efficiently access your content. A fast, mobile-friendly site helps everywhere.
So if your technical SEO foundation is solid, you're already halfway there. The divergence comes in content approach and formatting.
Where Google Still Dominates (And How to Optimize for It)
Google remains the heavyweight for navigational searches ("Nike store near me"), transactional searches ("buy standing desk"), and complex research queries where people want options, not answers.
Google's algorithm in 2025 has gotten better at understanding search intent and content quality. The helpful content updates from 2023-2024 fundamentally shifted what ranks. Thin content optimized purely for keywords? Dead. Comprehensive content that actually helps users? Thriving.
For Google optimization in 2026:
Focus on search intent matching. If someone searches "best CRM for small business," they want comparisons, not a definition of CRM. Google knows this. Your content should match the intent behind the query, not just include the keywords.
Build topical authority. Google increasingly favors sites that demonstrate expertise in a specific domain. Publishing 50 mediocre articles across random topics won't beat publishing 20 excellent articles that thoroughly cover one subject area. Go deep, not wide.
Earn legitimate backlinks. Yes, still. Links remain a top-three ranking factor. But the emphasis is on "legitimate"—guest posts on relevant sites, digital PR that earns natural mentions, creating resources people actually want to reference. The spammy link building tactics are not just ineffective; they're actively harmful.
Optimize for featured snippets. Position zero is still valuable real estate. Use clear, concise answers to common questions. Format content with bulleted lists, numbered steps, and definition-style paragraphs that Google can easily extract.
Update existing content regularly. Google's freshness algorithm rewards updated content. If you published something comprehensive in 2023, update it with 2025 data and republish. Add a "Last updated" date. Keep your best content current.
The traditional SEO playbook still works for Google. You just have to execute it at a higher quality level than before.
Where ChatGPT Search Diverges (And What to Do About It)
ChatGPT Search operates differently enough that some of your Google optimization tactics won't transfer.
First, ChatGPT doesn't care about your backlink profile the same way Google does. It cares about content quality and extractability. A page with zero backlinks but crystal-clear information can get cited over a page with 50 backlinks if the information is easier to extract and verify.
Second, ChatGPT Search seems to favor conversational, natural language content over keyword-optimized content. It's looking for information that reads like a human expert explaining something, not a blog post stuffed with variations of "best project management software" seventeen times.
Third, attribution matters differently. ChatGPT cites sources, but users don't always click through. You might get brand visibility and authority without the traffic. Whether that's valuable depends on your goals. (For brand building? Yes. For immediate conversions? Less clear.)
Here's how to optimize for ChatGPT Search:
Write in clear, declarative statements. ChatGPT extracts information more easily from straightforward sentences. Instead of "One might consider the possibility that email marketing could potentially be effective," write "Email marketing generates an average ROI of $36 for every dollar spent." Direct. Specific. Easy to cite.
Front-load your answers. Put the key information in the first paragraph of each section. ChatGPT's extraction algorithms prioritize information that appears early. If someone asks "What is content marketing," your definition should be in the first 2-3 sentences, not buried in paragraph four.
Use data and statistics prominently. ChatGPT loves citing specific numbers. Include relevant statistics, percentages, dates, and figures. Make them easy to find. "Recent studies show growth" is vague. "Q3 2025 data from HubSpot shows 67% of marketers increased content budgets" is citeable.
Create FAQ-style content. Question-and-answer format aligns perfectly with how ChatGPT processes queries. A well-structured FAQ section can get cited multiple times for different related questions.
Be the expert, not the aggregator. ChatGPT already aggregates information from multiple sources. What it needs from you is expert insight, original data, or specific examples. "Here's what we learned from running 200 A/B tests" is more valuable than "here's what experts say about A/B testing."
Include author credentials and dates. ChatGPT considers source credibility and recency. Clear bylines with relevant expertise and prominent publication/update dates increase your chances of being cited.
One more thing: ChatGPT Search seems to pull from a broader range of sources than just the top 10 Google results. I've seen content from position 15-20 in Google get cited by ChatGPT because it had the most direct answer to a specific question. So even if you're not crushing it in Google rankings yet, you can still win ChatGPT citations with the right content approach.
The Practical Strategy: Optimizing for Both Without Doubling Your Work
You don't need separate content strategies. You need one strategy that accounts for both platforms.
Start with topic selection. Choose subjects where you have genuine expertise or unique data. Both Google and ChatGPT favor authoritative content, so play to your strengths. If you're a SaaS company, write about your product category with specific insights from your customer data. If you're an agency, share case study learnings with real numbers.
Structure your content with both platforms in mind:
- Introduction: Clear, front-loaded answer to the main question (ChatGPT loves this)
- Detailed sections: Comprehensive coverage with proper heading hierarchy (Google loves this)
- Specific examples: Real companies, real numbers, real outcomes (both love this)
- FAQ section: Direct question-and-answer pairs (helps both, different ways)
- Updated date: Prominent timestamp showing recency (both favor fresh content)
Write naturally, but with clarity. You can have personality and be conversational while still making your points clearly. This article you're reading right now? It's optimized for both. Conversational tone, clear structure, specific information, prominent data points.
For technical implementation:
- Schema markup: Article schema, FAQ schema, and relevant structured data
- Clear metadata: Descriptive titles and meta descriptions that accurately summarize content
- Internal linking: Help both platforms understand your site structure and topical relationships
- Mobile optimization: Fast loading, readable formatting, accessible on all devices
- Author pages: Clear credentials and expertise signals
Monitor performance on both platforms. Google Search Console shows your Google performance. For ChatGPT, you'll need to monitor brand mentions and referral traffic from OpenAI domains. Some analytics platforms are starting to break this out separately. (Plausible and Fathom Analytics both show OpenAI referrals distinctly from other traffic sources.)
The Content Formats That Win on Each Platform
Some content types perform better on one platform than the other.
Google favors:
- Long-form comprehensive guides (2,000+ words)
- Comparison posts with detailed feature breakdowns
- Product reviews with pros, cons, and ratings
- Local business content with location-specific information
- Visual content with optimized images and alt text
ChatGPT Search favors:
- Concise explanations with clear definitions
- How-to content with step-by-step instructions
- Data-driven articles with specific statistics
- Expert insights and original research
- Recent content addressing current trends
The sweet spot? Content that combines both approaches. A comprehensive guide that includes clear definitions, specific data, step-by-step instructions, and detailed comparisons. It's more work upfront, but it performs across both platforms.
One format that works particularly well: the "definitive guide with quick-reference sections." Write the comprehensive long-form content Google loves, but include summary boxes, quick-answer sections, and key takeaways that ChatGPT can easily extract and cite.
What Changes in 2026 (And How to Prepare)
We're still early in the AI search era. Things will evolve.
Google is integrating more AI into search results with SGE (Search Generative Experience). By 2026, this will likely be the default for many query types. That means Google itself will synthesize answers from multiple sources, similar to ChatGPT Search.
The implication? Being citeable becomes important for Google too, not just ChatGPT.
Other AI search tools are emerging. Perplexity AI has gained traction. Bing's integration with ChatGPT continues to evolve. We might see more specialized AI search tools for specific industries.
The common thread: all of them favor clear, authoritative, extractable information.
To prepare:
Build brand recognition beyond search. If AI tools are synthesizing answers, your brand name in the citation becomes crucial. Invest in brand building through social media, email, podcasts, and other channels.
Focus on unique value. Content that's just a rehash of existing information has less value when AI can synthesize that information instantly. Create content with original research, unique perspectives, or proprietary data.
Diversify traffic sources. Don't rely entirely on search traffic from any single platform. Build email lists, social followings, and community engagement. Search is changing; owned audiences remain stable.
Monitor and adapt quickly. The platforms will update their algorithms and approaches. Set up monitoring for both Google rankings and AI citations. Be ready to adjust based on what's working.
And maybe most importantly: stay focused on creating genuinely helpful content. Both Google and ChatGPT are trying to surface the best information for users. If you're consistently creating the best content in your space, you'll adapt to whatever changes come.
The Bottom Line
Optimizing for both ChatGPT Search and Google isn't about choosing one or hedging your bets. It's about understanding that search behavior is fragmenting, and different users prefer different interfaces.
Some people want a quick answer from ChatGPT. Some want to browse multiple sources on Google. Both groups need your content, just accessed differently.
The good news? The fundamentals overlap more than they diverge. Clear writing, authoritative content, proper structure, and genuine expertise work everywhere. You're not building two separate strategies; you're building one strategy with platform-specific optimizations.
Start with your best content. Update it with clear structure, front-loaded answers, specific data, and proper schema markup. Monitor performance on both platforms. Double down on what works.
And remember: we're still figuring this out. The marketers who win in 2026 won't be the ones who perfectly executed a playbook from 2024. They'll be the ones who tested, adapted, and stayed focused on creating content that actually helps people—regardless of where those people are searching.
Because at the end of the day, that's what both platforms are trying to surface anyway.
Top comments (0)