Helping individuals and teams improve their software development practices.
Introducing testing, test automation, CI, CD, pair programming. That neighborhood.
I can clearly see the value of somehow paying an author for an individual article a few cents, (and as an author being paid for all the content I create) I am just worried the lack of control the paying person might feel.
Anyway, I looked at the HTML source of the homepage dev.to. It has the following entry:
Helping individuals and teams improve their software development practices.
Introducing testing, test automation, CI, CD, pair programming. That neighborhood.
Helping individuals and teams improve their software development practices.
Introducing testing, test automation, CI, CD, pair programming. That neighborhood.
Helping individuals and teams improve their software development practices.
Introducing testing, test automation, CI, CD, pair programming. That neighborhood.
Thanks for all the fast responses!
Oh, so the "Add Fund" is really confusing then.
I can clearly see the value of somehow paying an author for an individual article a few cents, (and as an author being paid for all the content I create) I am just worried the lack of control the paying person might feel.
Anyway, I looked at the HTML source of the homepage dev.to. It has the following entry:
I assume that means dev.to monetizes the homepage and probably all the pages via Uphold.
I also looked at the source of this page - your post - and it had the same entry with the same value.
Does that mean you have not configured the monetization on dev.to yet?
Oh and I clearly missed the last sentence from your previous comment about setting the sites. That explains it. I'll check it out.
They use a base payment pointer, and an author one I see, so they are probably also getting some cash from this.
Where do you see the "author one"?
Main one:
Pointers:
Thanks!