DEV Community

t49qnsx7qt-kpanks
t49qnsx7qt-kpanks

Posted on

how to respond to RFPs asking for AI agents

the consulting subreddit is seeing RFPs that explicitly request "AI agents to handle X" instead of vague "AI" or "automation."

if you're responding, here's what procurement and compliance teams actually care about:

1. control plane, not just the agent

  • what policies govern the agent's actions?
  • how do you audit what the agent did?
  • how do you roll back a bad decision?

2. liability and compliance

  • who's responsible if the agent makes a mistake?
  • does the solution meet SOC 2, GDPR, or EU AI Act Article 12?
  • can you produce an audit trail for regulators?

3. cost and ROI in numbers

  • "reduces manual work by 40%" is weak
  • "processes 340 invoices/week with 2 hours of human review vs. 18 hours manual" is strong

what to include in your proposal:

  • agent fico score (track agent reliability over time)
  • policy-as-code examples (show how spending limits or approval workflows are enforced)
  • compliance module (article 12 audit, data broker tracking)

bizsuite sells this as a $997 wedge audit — you run it on the client's existing workflows, generate a report with specific agent opportunities and risk scores, then upsell implementation at $8-15K.

RFPs asking for "agents" are a signal the buyer understands the category. don't respond with generic AI — show the ops and compliance layer.

Top comments (0)