Iām not asking compare the speed of sql vs nosql. What I mean is compare the speed in large scale between Firebase and Supabase which many thing will effect that, not just because it build from sql or nosql
I would say relational databases are far more scalable than NoSQL database
That is a false statement.
NoSQL databases can afford horizontal scaling whereas relational databases cannot. The main benefit of NoSQL databases is better scalability! Queries in NoSQL databases are ridiculously fast too.
Also, relational databases are far more resistant to change down the road than NoSQL databases.
The question is whether most apps actually need the added scalability with today's computing power considered; not whether there is a chance a relational database is more scalable than a NoSQL database.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Do we have any comparison in performance, scaling between Supabase and firebase?
In terms of scalability, I would say relational databases are far more scalable than NoSQL database.
Here is an article comparing Supabase and Firebase
blog.logrocket.com/firebase-vs-sup...
Iām not asking compare the speed of sql vs nosql. What I mean is compare the speed in large scale between Firebase and Supabase which many thing will effect that, not just because it build from sql or nosql
That is a false statement.
NoSQL databases can afford horizontal scaling whereas relational databases cannot. The main benefit of NoSQL databases is better scalability! Queries in NoSQL databases are ridiculously fast too.
Also, relational databases are far more resistant to change down the road than NoSQL databases.
The question is whether most apps actually need the added scalability with today's computing power considered; not whether there is a chance a relational database is more scalable than a NoSQL database.