DEV Community

Nguyen Khanh Tung
Nguyen Khanh Tung

Posted on • Edited on

How the NKTg Law Aligns with Classical Mechanics

"The NKTg Law does not reject Newton, Euler, or Kepler—it complements them by modeling motion in mass-varying systems with surprising clarity."

📜 Classical Mechanics: Powerful but Limited
For over 300 years, the frameworks developed by Newton, Euler, and Kepler have successfully described the motion of objects in countless domains — from falling apples to orbiting planets.

But what happens when mass isn’t constant?

In real-world systems like rockets, comets, or evaporating particles, mass changes over time. To capture this complexity, we introduce the NKTg Law: a conceptual extension that builds on classical mechanics rather than replacing it.

🧩 Quick Recap: Classical Frameworks
Let’s briefly revisit the giants:

Newton’s Second Law: F = ma or F = dp/dt

Euler’s Equations: Handle rotational motion in rigid bodies

Kepler’s Laws: Describe planetary orbits under constant gravitational mass

A common assumption across all three?
👉 Mass is constant (unless explicitly stated otherwise).

✨ Introducing the NKTg Law
The NKTg Law proposes two new quantities that help us analyze systems with variable mass:

NKTg₁ = x • p → Position-Momentum Interaction

NKTg₂ = (dm/dt) • p → Mass-Change-Momentum Interaction

Where:

x: position (relative to a reference point)

p = mv: linear momentum

dm/dt: rate of change of mass

Unit: NKTm — a proposed unit for varying inertia systems

These two terms reflect how the system moves toward or away from equilibrium under the influence of momentum and mass variation.

🧠 Why It Still Aligns with Newton
The NKTg Law inherits Newtonian principles like p = mv. But it adapts them for modern systems:

NKTg₁ = x • p acts as a dynamic indicator for how momentum is distributed in space.

NKTg₂ = (dm/dt) • p extends F = dp/dt to account for variable mass.

Rather than contradicting Newton, NKTg adds a layer that applies beautifully to cases where m ≠ constant.

🌍 NKTg and Kepler’s Orbits
Kepler's laws describe elliptical motion but don't explain why planets move faster at perihelion.

Using NKTg:

NKTg₁ changes sign at orbital extremes, signaling momentum reversal — which aligns with Kepler’s second law (equal areas in equal times).

NKTg₂ can reflect changes if the orbiting body’s mass is varying (e.g., outgassing comets).

This gives us a momentum-based perspective on orbital mechanics.

🌀 NKTg and Euler's Rigid Body Dynamics
Euler’s equations are vital for rotating systems, but assume constant mass and defined torques.

While NKTg doesn’t directly handle angular momentum, NKTg₁ has a geometric interpretation when x and p are not aligned — creating angular-like tendencies without torque equations.

It offers a pre-rotational view — a simpler entry point before diving into Euler’s full formalism.

🚀 Real-World Relevance
Mass-varying systems are everywhere:

Rocket stages shedding fuel (dm/dt ≠ 0)

Biological organisms gaining/losing mass

Atmospheric particles aggregating or evaporating

The NKTg Law gives us a minimalist yet powerful framework to reason about such systems — using only basic vectors and derivatives.

Top comments (0)