Roadmap Planning System
A complete roadmap planning toolkit with quarterly and annual planning templates, prioritization frameworks (RICE, ICE, MoSCoW), capacity planning tools, and stakeholder presentation formats.
Key Features
- Quarterly Roadmap Template — Theme-based planning with clear commitments vs. explorations
- Annual Strategic Roadmap — Year-level vision with quarterly milestones
- RICE Prioritization Framework — Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort scoring with calculator
- ICE Scoring Model — Impact, Confidence, Ease for rapid prioritization
- MoSCoW Classification — Must-have, Should-have, Could-have, Won't-have categorization
- Capacity Planning — Team capacity calculator with allocation tracking
- Stakeholder Views — Different roadmap views for executives, engineering, and customers
What's Included
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
templates/quarterly-roadmap.md |
Quarter-level planning template |
templates/annual-roadmap.md |
Annual strategic roadmap |
templates/rice-prioritization.md |
RICE scoring framework and calculator |
templates/ice-scoring.md |
ICE rapid prioritization template |
templates/moscow-classification.md |
MoSCoW requirement categorization |
templates/capacity-planning.md |
Team capacity and allocation tracker |
templates/roadmap-exec-view.md |
Executive-level roadmap presentation |
templates/roadmap-eng-view.md |
Engineering-focused roadmap detail |
docs/overview.md |
Planning methodology guide |
config.example.yaml |
Planning cadence and framework defaults |
Quick Start
- Start with
templates/annual-roadmap.mdto define your yearly themes and bets - Break the current quarter into initiatives using
templates/quarterly-roadmap.md - Prioritize your backlog using RICE (
templates/rice-prioritization.md) - Validate capacity with
templates/capacity-planning.md - Create stakeholder views for your next roadmap review
Template Examples
RICE Prioritization Matrix
Initiative | Reach | Impact | Confidence | Effort | RICE Score
--------------------|---------|--------|------------|---------|----------
Onboarding redesign | 5,000/q | 3 (high)| 80% | 3 eng-mo| 4,000
API v2 launch | 800/q | 3 (high)| 90% | 6 eng-mo| 360
Dark mode | 12,000/q| 1 (low) | 95% | 1 eng-mo| 11,400
SSO integration | 200/q | 3 (high)| 70% | 2 eng-mo| 210
Mobile push notifs | 8,000/q | 2 (med) | 60% | 2 eng-mo| 4,800
Score = (Reach x Impact x Confidence) / Effort
Priority order: Dark mode > Mobile push > Onboarding > API v2 > SSO
Note: RICE is a starting point, not the final answer. Apply judgment.
MoSCoW Classification
MUST HAVE (launch blockers — non-negotiable):
- [ ] User authentication and authorization
- [ ] Payment processing with error handling
- [ ] Core workflow: create, edit, delete
SHOULD HAVE (important but launch is viable without them):
- [ ] Email notifications for key events
- [ ] Export to CSV functionality
- [ ] Search and filtering
COULD HAVE (nice-to-have if time permits):
- [ ] Dark mode theme
- [ ] Keyboard shortcuts
- [ ] Bulk operations
WON'T HAVE (explicitly deferred — not this release):
- [ ] Mobile app
- [ ] Third-party integrations
- [ ] Multi-language support
Quarterly Roadmap Structure
Q3 2026 Roadmap — Theme: "Reduce Time-to-Value"
COMMITTED (high confidence, resources allocated):
1. Onboarding redesign | 3 engineers | Jul-Aug | KR: TTFV < 1 day
2. In-app help system | 1 engineer | Jul | KR: Support tickets -20%
3. Template library | 2 engineers | Aug-Sep | KR: Activation +15%
PLANNED (medium confidence, pending capacity):
4. API documentation overhaul | 1 engineer | Sep | KR: API adoption +25%
5. Mobile responsive fixes | 1 engineer | Aug | KR: Mobile bounce -30%
EXPLORING (low confidence, needs discovery):
6. AI-assisted onboarding | Discovery | Q3 | Decision point: end of Aug
7. Partner integrations | Research | Q3 | Decision point: mid Sep
Usage Guide
- Annual Planning (December): Set 3-5 strategic themes for the year. Each theme should map to a company OKR. Don't over-commit at this level.
- Quarterly Planning (month before quarter): Break themes into initiatives. Prioritize with RICE. Validate capacity. Classify with MoSCoW.
- Monthly Check-ins: Review progress against quarterly commitments. Adjust PLANNED items if capacity changes. Move EXPLORING items to PLANNED when discovery is complete.
- Stakeholder Reviews: Use exec view for leadership (themes + outcomes). Use eng view for technical teams (details + dependencies).
Best Practices
- Separate commitments from aspirations — use Committed / Planned / Exploring tiers to set honest expectations
- Time-bound everything — "Q3" is better than "H2"; "July" is better than "Q3"
- Prioritize outcomes over features — "Reduce churn by 10%" is better than "Build feature X"
- Revisit quarterly — a roadmap that never changes is either perfect or ignored
- Show what you're NOT doing — a roadmap without trade-offs is a wish list
- Version and date every share — stakeholders will reference outdated versions; make it easy to check currency
This is 1 of 11 resources in the PM Toolkit Pro toolkit. Get the complete [Roadmap Planning System] with all files, templates, and documentation for $39.
Or grab the entire PM Toolkit Pro bundle (11 products) for $129 — save 30%.
Top comments (0)