For knowledgeable Wikipedia writers such as The Wiki Inc, research is a general phrase. Expanding one's knowledge of Wikipedia policy requires research. It also requires assembling information on a subject, assessing and classifying sources, obtaining information of general interest, and recognizing homogeneity in ontological theory.
Wikipedia Expertise:
Wikipedia experts at The Wiki Inc. regularly study the site's content guidelines. You need to review and reaffirm your comprehension of the content guidelines that are relevant to the topics you write. For instance, writing biographies of living individuals is one of my specialties. Additional standards are applied to biographical entries to safeguard the reputation and privacy of the person.
Integrating Sources:
It seems simple to Google a topic. However, most of Google's results for a certain topic are typically useless. Google may produce articles that refer to a topic but don't cover it. On the other hand, the customer might send them a link to every online piece that mentions them. Once more, the majority of the client's submissions will typically be useless. An authority on Wikipedia will know which articles to keep and which to discard.
Categorizing:
Wikipedians divide sources into three groups when evaluating and categorizing them. The most prevalent source type is primary sources. The number of primary sources used by Wikipedia is constrained. Only primary sources may be used by Wikipedians to confirm details such as names or dates.
Wikipedia experts value secondary sources because we can use them to prove notability. Only secondary sources are cited in quality articles. Because of this, we favor secondary sources over primary ones.
General Wikipedia Experts' Interest Points:
Less skilled encyclopaedists overemphasize the goals of their clients. I do, however, consider Wikipedia's users to be clients. You may aim to extract general interest items that Wikipedia users would find fascinating and useful when selecting what the Wikipedia entry should contain. Alternately, you will extract general interest elements that confirm that a subject satisfies the particular criterion if you are attempting to show that it matches some of Wikipedia's alternative criteria for living individuals.
How To Recognize Ontological Uniformity?
Although the content of a website can vary depending on the subject, you may look at how other pages in the same category are styled. Don't use entries regarding a related topic as a basis for my work. Even though topics in the same category may use comparable technical standards like themes and page layouts, each topic has a unique set of sources, and various sources will provide different outcomes.
Top comments (0)