Passionate full stack developer, course author for Educative, book author for Packt.
Find my work and get to know me on my Linktree: https://linktr.ee/thormeier
That's an awesome package you built there, a much simpler alternative to using Puppeteer! Are calls of magic methods also inspectable or do they still require some manual labour to be mocked?
Mind if I add a link to the package to the post itself?
I haven't tried to mock the magic methods, but all the stuff your code sticks on the instance is exposed under $data
A link in the post would be great!
Also a quick note re- puppeteer, Alpine.js itself is tested using Jest with baked in JSDOM (& that's also what test-utils uses) so that's another piece of the puzzle between JS-only unit tests and E2E tests with puppeteer or Cypress
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
That's an awesome package you built there, a much simpler alternative to using Puppeteer! Are calls of magic methods also inspectable or do they still require some manual labour to be mocked?
Mind if I add a link to the package to the post itself?
I haven't tried to mock the magic methods, but all the stuff your code sticks on the instance is exposed under
$dataA link in the post would be great!
Also a quick note re- puppeteer, Alpine.js itself is tested using Jest with baked in JSDOM (& that's also what test-utils uses) so that's another piece of the puzzle between JS-only unit tests and E2E tests with puppeteer or Cypress