This article was originally published on Best GPU for LLM. The full version with interactive tools, FAQ, and live pricing is on the original site.
Quick answer: You need at least 48GB of VRAM to run Llama 70B at usable quality. A single RTX 5090 (32GB) can run it at aggressive Q3/Q4 quantization, but for good quality you'll need dual GPUs or a workstation card like the A6000.
See the recommended pick on the original guide
The VRAM problem with 70B models
Llama 70B is one of the most capable open-source language models available, but it's demanding. Here's how much VRAM it actually needs:
VRAM chart available at the original article
| Quantization | Model Size | VRAM Required | Quality Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| FP16 (full) | ~140GB | 140GB+ | Best quality |
| Q8 | ~70GB | 72GB+ | Near-lossless |
| Q6_K | ~54GB | 56GB+ | Minimal loss |
| Q5_K_M | ~48GB | 50GB+ | Slight loss |
| Q4_K_M | ~40GB | 42GB+ | Noticeable on complex tasks |
| Q3_K_M | ~32GB | 34GB+ | Significant degradation |
| Q2_K | ~25GB | 28GB+ | Major quality loss |
The VRAM column includes overhead for context window and KV cache. Actual usage varies with context length.
GPU options for Llama 70B
Single GPU options
| GPU | VRAM | Can Run 70B? | Best Quantization | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTX 5090 | 32GB | Yes, limited | Q3_K_M (degraded) | ~$2,000 |
| RTX 4090 | 24GB | Barely | Q2_K only (poor) | ~$1,600 |
| A6000 | 48GB | Yes | Q4_K_M+ (good) | ~$3,500 |
| A100 80GB | 80GB | Yes | Q8+ (excellent) | ~$8,000+ |
Dual GPU options
| Setup | Total VRAM | Best Quantization | Approx Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2x RTX 3090 | 48GB | Q4_K_M (good) | ~$1,800 used |
| 2x RTX 4090 | 48GB | Q5_K_M (great) | ~$3,200 |
| 2x RTX 5090 | 64GB | Q6_K (excellent) | ~$4,000+ |
See the recommended pick on the original guide
See the recommended pick on the original guide
Best approaches by budget
Budget: Under $2,000 — Dual RTX 3090
The cheapest way to run Llama 70B at decent quality:
- 48GB combined VRAM handles Q4_K_M quantization
- RTX 3090s are widely available used for $800-900 each — see our dual RTX 3090 setup guide for the full build walkthrough
- Ollama and llama.cpp support multi-GPU splitting natively
- Inference speed is slower due to inter-GPU communication
Downsides: Needs a motherboard with two x16 PCIe slots, a beefy PSU (1200W+), and good case airflow. Two cards at 350W each generate serious heat.
Mid-range: $2,000-4,000 — RTX 5090 or dual 4090
Single RTX 5090: Simplest setup. Can run 70B at Q3_K_M, which is usable but you'll notice quality loss on reasoning-heavy tasks. Best if you also use the GPU for smaller models where it excels. For tips on making the most of a single-card 70B setup, see how to run 70B on a single GPU, and for a broader look at the $2,000 tier our best GPU for LLM under $2,000 guide ranks the alternatives.
Dual RTX 4090: 48GB total VRAM for Q4_K_M+ quality. Better output quality than a single 5090, but more complex setup and higher power draw.
High-end: $3,500+ — NVIDIA A6000
The NVIDIA A6000 with 48GB VRAM on a single card is the cleanest solution:
- Runs Q4_K_M and Q5_K_M on one card
- No multi-GPU complexity
- Professional-grade reliability
- ECC memory for consistent results
The downside is price and availability. The A6000 is a professional card with professional pricing.
Ollama setup for multi-GPU
If you go the dual-GPU route, Ollama handles GPU splitting automatically:
OLLAMA_NUM_GPU=999 ollama run llama3:70b-q4_K_M
For llama.cpp, specify the split:
--tensor-split 24,24
Both tools will distribute model layers across available GPUs. Inference speed scales roughly 60-70% of linear with two cards due to communication overhead.
Inference speed expectations
| Setup | Llama 70B Q4_K_M | Tokens/sec |
|---|---|---|
| Single A6000 (48GB) | Full model on GPU | ~15-20 tok/s |
| 2x RTX 4090 (48GB) | Split across GPUs | ~12-18 tok/s |
| 2x RTX 3090 (48GB) | Split across GPUs | ~8-12 tok/s |
| Single RTX 5090 (Q3) | Degraded quality | ~18-22 tok/s |
| CPU offload (partial) | Slow | ~2-5 tok/s |
These are approximate for 2048 context length. Longer contexts reduce speed.
Should you even run 70B locally?
Before investing in hardware, consider:
- Is 70B actually better for your use case? For many tasks, a well-prompted 13B or fine-tuned 34B model performs nearly as well.
- Would cloud be cheaper? If you only need 70B occasionally, cloud GPU rental (RunPod, Vast.ai) at $1-2/hour may be more cost-effective than a $3,000+ hardware investment. See RunPod vs Vast.ai for LLM to understand which platform offers better pricing and reliability for this workload, and our cloud GPU TCO vs self-hosted LLM breakdown for the exact monthly break-even math.
- Do you need the privacy? Local inference means your data never leaves your machine. If that matters, the hardware cost is justified.
Which GPU should YOU buy for Llama 70B?
- Running 70B as your primary model? Get 2x RTX 4090 ($3,200). 48GB combined VRAM handles Q4_K_M with good quality and decent speed.
- Running 70B occasionally alongside smaller models? Get an RTX 5090 ($2,000). Handles Q3_K_M for 70B and excels at 7B-34B models the rest of the time.
- Need the best single-card 70B experience? Get an NVIDIA A6000 ($3,500). 48GB on one card means Q4_K_M+ without multi-GPU complexity.
- Only need 70B sometimes? Use cloud GPUs instead. $1-2/hour beats a $3,000+ hardware investment for occasional use.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Buying a single 24GB GPU expecting to run 70B — the RTX 4090 at 24GB can only fit Q2_K quantization, where output quality is significantly degraded. You need 32GB minimum, and realistically 48GB for good results.
- Ignoring memory bandwidth in dual-GPU setups — inter-GPU communication adds latency. Two RTX 3090s (936 GB/s each) outperform two RTX 4060 Tis even if total VRAM is similar, because bandwidth determines token generation speed.
- Not accounting for context length VRAM overhead — at Q4_K_M, Llama 70B uses ~40GB for weights alone. A 4K context window adds 3-5GB for the KV cache. Plan your VRAM budget accordingly. For a full breakdown of exactly how much VRAM each 70B quantization level needs, see how much VRAM for a 70B model.
- Skipping the "do I actually need 70B" question — a well-quantized 34B model on a single RTX 4090 often matches 70B at Q2_K in output quality, at 3x the inference speed and half the hardware cost. Llama 4 Scout is another alternative worth considering — it beats Llama 3 70B on benchmarks and fits on a single RTX 5090; see our Llama 4 Scout GPU guide for details. DeepSeek's reasoning-tuned 32B is another single-card alternative — see our DeepSeek GPU guide for VRAM needs and tok/s on 24GB cards. If you are wondering whether a budget card like the 4060 Ti can even attempt 70B, see can the RTX 4060 Ti run Llama 70B?
Final verdict
| Situation | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Must be single GPU | NVIDIA A6000 (48GB) |
| Best value | 2x RTX 3090 used (~$1,800) |
| Best performance/value | 2x RTX 4090 (~$3,200) |
| Occasional 70B use | Cloud GPU (RunPod/Vast.ai) |
| Mostly smaller models | RTX 5090 single card |
See the recommended pick on the original guide
For most people, Llama 70B is not a single-GPU workload at consumer prices. Accept that and plan for either dual GPUs, a workstation card, or cloud.
The best GPU for Llama 70B is the one that gives you enough VRAM to avoid aggressive quantization. Quality degrades fast below Q4 — don't sacrifice output quality to save on hardware.
Related guides on Best GPU for LLM
- Best Budget GPU for Local LLM in 2026 (Under $350)
- Best GPU for 13B Parameter Models in 2026 (Ranked)
- Best GPU for 34B Models: Yi, CodeLlama & Qwen
Continue on Best GPU for LLM for the complete guide with interactive calculators and current GPU prices.
Top comments (0)