Right, I mean... so many parentheses. I know that's not an aesthetic issue but trying to figure out where everything begins and ends makes my brain cry.
()=> :} isn't a valid span of JS in any non-string context, but there is bound to be a Haskell library that introduces a ()=>:} binary operator/infix function.
(This is a joke, all of ():} are reserved characters)
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I personally find JavaScript to be absolutely hideous.
Definitely, but there are some small signs to become more handleable.
Same here.
It's right behind Java, IMHO. It's much easier to read obfusticated C than JS.
Right, I mean... so many parentheses. I know that's not an aesthetic issue but trying to figure out where everything begins and ends makes my brain cry.
Sounds like you need Bracket Pair Colorizer™
This is by far the most useful comment I've read here, thanks Mihail
Why would anybody care to read obfuscated code in the first place without the help of formatter? Unless you are developer of bundler...
Javascript is very close to start looking like a bunch of emojis:
()=> :}
HA! You are 100% right!
()=> :}isn't a valid span of JS in any non-string context, but there is bound to be a Haskell library that introduces a()=>:}binary operator/infix function.(This is a joke, all of
():}are reserved characters)